Recent revelations have cast a shadow over what was supposed to be a joyous occasion for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, as suspicions arise about the authenticity of their daughter Lilibet‘s first birthday celebration.
Allegations suggest that the much-publicized party at Frogmore Cottage may have been staged, raising eyebrows and igniting discussions among royal watchers.
According to reports, Lilibet’s birthday fell on the Saturday of the Queen’s Jubilee weekend, a time when family gatherings were expected to be warm and inclusive.
However, the absence of the Cambridges, William and Kate, at this supposed celebration felt like a deliberate snub to the Sussexes.
Sources close to the situation indicated that this absence was particularly jarring, especially in light of the festive atmosphere surrounding the Jubilee.
Curiously, details surrounding the birthday party have emerged that seem to contradict the narrative presented by Meghan’s public relations team.
Observers noted that the striped patio furniture seen in the birthday photos bears a striking resemblance to furniture from Meghan’s former home in Toronto, where she lived while filming “Suits.”
This connection has led many to question whether the birthday bash actually took place at Frogmore or if it was merely a clever setup.
Adding to the intrigue, a deleted Instagram photo from Meghan’s time in Toronto shows a similar outdoor setting, complete with monochrome decor that aligns closely with the aesthetic of the birthday images.
This has fueled speculation that the photos shared with the media were staged, potentially using children borrowed from other families to create the illusion of a genuine celebration.
The discrepancies don’t stop there.
Observers have pointed out that the lawn in the birthday image appears unusually manicured, resembling more of a Toronto backyard than the lush, well-kept grounds of a royal estate.
This observation raises the question: would groundskeepers at a UK palace allow grass to grow in such a natural-looking state?
It seems unlikely, as royal gardens are typically maintained to perfection.
Another layer of complexity comes from the involvement of Missan Harraman, a photographer favored by Meghan and Harry.
Harraman has previously manipulated images for the couple, leading some to wonder if he played a role in altering the widely circulated birthday photo as well.
Were media outlets misled into believing they were publishing an authentic moment from a royal celebration?
Twitter has seen a flurry of theories suggesting that the Sussex children may not have even been in the UK for the Jubilee festivities.
Speculation is rife that Lilibet never had the chance to meet her great-grandmother, the late Queen.
According to Jobson’s book, Harry and Meghan last saw the Queen in April, during a brief visit, which casts doubt on their purported reunion during the Jubilee weekend.
Earlier reports from The Sun suggested that the Queen did meet Lilibet, although it was described as a private family gathering without the possibility of official photographs.
Palace insiders reportedly feared that any images captured by Harry and Meghan could end up on American television or in Harry’s forthcoming memoir, further complicating the narrative.
As the dust settles, the question remains: was Lilibet’s birthday party a genuine celebration, or a carefully curated event designed for public consumption?
The discrepancies in the photos, the absence of key family members, and the potential staging all contribute to a growing sense of skepticism regarding the Sussexes’ portrayal of family life.
Related Stories
