Unearthed footage of Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, from her time on the TV show Suits has sparked controversy over one of the claims she made in the Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan.
In the documentary, Meghan asserted that she was clueless about how to curtsy, recounting a deep, exaggerated bow she allegedly performed when meeting Queen Elizabeth for the first time.
Despite her role on Suits at the time, where she played Rachel Zane, a paralegal, Meghan stated she was inexperienced in royal protocol.
During a scene in the documentary, Meghan shared an anecdote about driving to the Royal Lodge with Prince Harry and being reminded by him to curtsy to his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth.
Initially brushing off the suggestion as a joke, Meghan later admitted to realizing the significance of the gesture, describing the experience as akin to a medieval show.
She then demonstrated her supposed first deep curtsy, addressing an imaginary queen with a smirk, while casting a glance at Harry.
Contrary to Meghan’s narrative, resurfaced footage from Suits captures her character, Rachel Zane, executing a brief curtsy towards attorney Louis Litt, portrayed by Rick Hoffman.
The video, shared by an Instagram user under the handle @emilyer, has since gone viral.
The post highlighted the stark contrast between Meghan’s curtsy proficiency on Suits and her portrayal of ignorance in the Netflix documentary.
Emily, a self-described media and journalism major with a penchant for fact-checking, questioned Meghan’s need to fabricate such details, particularly noting Meghan’s background in ballet, which should have equipped her with curtsy knowledge.
The post elicited mixed reactions from followers, with some expressing skepticism towards Meghan’s authenticity, while others defended her actions.
Criticisms ranged from accusations of deceit to questioning the context and appropriateness of the curtsy displayed in the Suits clip.
Amidst the debate, supporters argued that Meghan’s unfamiliarity with royal customs, as an American, justified any discrepancies in her curtsy performance.
One individual emphasized understanding Meghan’s intentions as tongue-in-cheek rather than mocking.
The online discourse surrounding Meghan’s curtsy controversy reflects a broader sentiment towards her public image and credibility.
While detractors seize upon perceived inconsistencies to cast doubt on her character, supporters rally to her defense, attributing any missteps to cultural differences and misunderstandings.
The clash of opinions underscores the scrutiny faced by public figures like Meghan Markle and the enduring fascination with the intricacies of royal etiquette.
As discussions continue to unfold, the revelation of Meghan’s past curtsy proficiency adds a new layer to the ongoing scrutiny of her statements and actions.
The juxtaposition between her on-screen portrayal and real-life encounters raises questions about authenticity and perception in the realm of royal engagements.
Whether viewed as a trivial misstep or a deliberate fabrication, Meghan’s curtsy controversy exemplifies the complexities of navigating tradition and modernity within the royal family.
Related Stories
