Conservative columnist Matt Walsh has sparked controversy by criticizing the Time magazine cover featuring Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, labeling it as a sad display for the Duke.
In a tweet, Walsh described Harry’s posture on the cover, crouching behind his wife while holding onto her shoulder, as emblematic of a modern beta male who has been “neutered.”
He expressed disappointment at what he perceived as the media’s endorsement of this portrayal.
In a swift response, Democratic Party congressman Ruben Gallego came to Harry’s defense, highlighting the Duke’s military service with two tours in Afghanistan.
Gallego pointed out that Harry faced life-threatening risks during his time as an attack pilot, refuting the notion that he embodies characteristics of a beta male.
The congressman’s tweet emphasized Harry’s courage and resilience in the face of danger.
Despite their recent feature on Time magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are reportedly experiencing a decline in support in the United States.
Royal expert Richard Eden revealed that the couple’s reception in America appears to be shifting, with opinions becoming increasingly polarized.
Eden suggested that the couple’s presence evokes strong reactions both in the UK and across the Atlantic.
The divide in public sentiment towards Harry and Meghan seems to align with political affiliations in the US, as conservative pundit Candace Owens expressed her disapproval of the couple’s portrayal on the Time magazine cover.
Owens criticized what she perceived as the ongoing emasculation of Prince Harry in the public eye, questioning the impact of such imagery on his reputation.
Her remarks underscore the contentious nature of the couple’s public image.
Following their inclusion in Time’s prestigious list, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have attracted significant attention, though not all of it positive.
Some observers, including royal expert Richard Eden, initially questioned the authenticity of the couple’s photoshoot for the magazine, deeming it reminiscent of satire.
Eden highlighted the couple’s polarizing effect on audiences, noting that their fame comes with a fair share of skepticism.
Amidst debates about the couple’s influence and public perception, commentators have raised concerns about the authenticity and strategic nature of Meghan and Harry’s public image.
Speculation about the couple’s intentions and motivations has led to varying interpretations of their actions, with some viewing them as calculated and contrived.
The intricacies of their public persona continue to fuel discussions and debates among observers.
Notably, Prince Harry has faced criticism from conservative figures in the past, particularly after making controversial remarks about the US Constitution.
His comments on the First Amendment drew ire from politicians such as Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Dan Crenshaw, who responded with sarcasm and mockery.
The Duke’s statements have further fueled existing tensions and divisions within public discourse.
As Meghan Markle and Prince Harry navigate the complexities of public scrutiny and fame, their actions and statements continue to provoke reactions from various quarters.
The couple’s evolving public image reflects broader societal debates about power, influence, and authenticity in the realm of celebrity.
Despite their global prominence, they remain subject to intense scrutiny and criticism, highlighting the challenges of balancing personal identity with public perception.
Related Stories
