Royal commentator Richard Eaton recently discussed the significant news that Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, has been appointed as the new royal patron of both the Rugby Football League and the Rugby Football Union.
This move is seen as a bitter blow to Prince Harry, who has a deep love for the sport and lost the patronage when he stepped back from his royal duties.
Eaton also delved into the other patronages left behind by the Sussexes, suggesting that the National Theatre patronage should have been given to a different royal instead of Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall.
During an appearance on Mail Plus Palace Confidential, Eaton shared his insights on the new patronages, emphasizing the impact of Kate’s appointment on Prince Harry.
He highlighted Harry’s passion for rugby and the significance of seeing the patronage transferred to someone else, particularly the Duchess of Cambridge.
Eaton noted that the appointment of Kate could potentially encourage more women to engage with rugby and broaden its appeal, leveraging her influence to promote the sport.
Eaton also expressed reservations about Camilla’s appointment as the patron of the National Theatre, questioning whether she was the most suitable choice for the role.
Drawing comparisons to Meghan Markle‘s brief tenure in the position, he suggested that Prince Edward, known for his enthusiasm for theatre, would have been a more fitting candidate.
Despite acknowledging Camilla’s love for theatre, Eaton hinted at a perceived sidelining of Edward and his family, indicating a lack of recognition for their contributions.
According to Omid Scobie, a journalist and co-author of Finding Freedom, Prince Harry is cognizant of the dynamics at play regarding Kate assuming new patronages.
Scobie remarked that Harry understands the transition of patronages as a natural part of the royal system, noting early speculations about Kate taking on the rugby patronages.
While acknowledging Kate’s genuine interest in the sport, Scobie highlighted the bittersweet aspect of seeing Harry’s beloved initiatives entrusted to others.
Avid sports enthusiast Kate was officially announced as the patron of the Rugby Football League and the Rugby Football Union, a role she eagerly embraced.
The announcement was made via the Cambridge’s Twitter account, where Kate expressed her excitement about collaborating with the two esteemed organizations to leverage the power of sports in fostering community cohesion and individual growth.
This development coincided with Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, assuming the role of patron of the National Theatre, previously held by Meghan Markle.
While Harry may come to terms with Kate’s assumption of the rugby patronage, Omid suggested that Harry’s deeper disappointment lies in losing his military honors.
Despite understanding the implications of stepping back from royal duties, Harry cherished his military titles and the sense of duty they embodied.
Nevertheless, Omid assured that Harry remains supportive of Kate’s new responsibilities, viewing her stewardship of his former passions as a positive continuation within the royal family dynamic.
