In a recent article, Tina Brown stirred the pot by criticizing Prince William and suggesting that Prince Harry‘s return to the UK is imminent.
Her comments come on the heels of an alleged impending resignation of King Charles‘s private secretary, Clive Alderton.
According to Brown, these developments create a perfect storm for Harry to make a comeback.
However, her perspective has been met with skepticism, especially given her history of disparaging remarks about Meghan Markle.
Brown has never shied away from expressing her disdain for Meghan, often labeling her decisions as poor.
Just days prior, she claimed Meghan had the “worst judgment,” a sentiment she has repeated multiple times.
Despite her criticisms of Meghan, Brown has consistently expressed a desire to see Prince Harry back in Britain.
In fact, she famously stated that there’s a “Harry-shaped hole” in the monarchy, suggesting that his absence is deeply felt.
Yet, one has to wonder if Brown is living in a fantasy world.
After all, Harry left the UK five years ago, fully embracing his new life in California.
It’s hard to reconcile the image of a man who has moved on with the notion that he would return to a family that has treated him and his wife so poorly.
Brown’s desperation for Harry’s return seems palpable, especially when contrasted with her views on Prince William, whom she describes as boring and in dire need of excitement.
In her article, Brown reiterated her belief that the British public craves Harry’s unique touch, claiming that his presence could alleviate some of the royal family’s struggles.
She pointed out that William has faced significant challenges this past year, particularly with health issues affecting both his father and wife.
Yet, she fails to acknowledge that Harry is content in Montecito, where he has built a loving home.
Brown’s remarks about Harry’s contributions, especially his military service and charity work, seem to be overshadowed by her fixation on his return.
It appears she has overlooked the fact that Harry and Meghan endured relentless scrutiny and hostility during their time in the UK.
As Harry himself noted, the expectation was for Meghan to leave, but no one anticipated that he would follow suit.
The notion that Harry would abandon his wife and children to return to a toxic environment is simply unrealistic.
Brown’s assumptions suggest a profound misunderstanding of Harry’s current priorities.
He has settled into a fulfilling life in California, far removed from the chaos of royal duties.
Furthermore, Brown’s critique of William as needing Harry to keep him grounded is baffling.
She describes William as surrounded by sycophants, indicating that he lacks genuine feedback.
This assertion raises questions about the dynamics within the royal family and how they perceive one another.
It’s astonishing that she believes Harry’s presence is essential for William’s humility.
Brown’s insistence that William should “suck it up” and allow Harry a role in the monarchy is equally perplexing.
She argues that the UK needs to strengthen its ties with Europe and the Commonwealth, and that Harry and Meghan could help facilitate this.
However, this perspective ignores the deep-seated issues that led to Harry and Meghan’s departure in the first place.
The reality is that the royal family’s treatment of Meghan has left a lasting impression, not just on them but on the public as well.
Many Commonwealth nations have witnessed the unfair treatment of the couple and may not be eager to welcome them back under the same circumstances.
Brown’s vision of Harry and Meghan rolling out the red carpet for royal duties seems utterly detached from reality.
As Brown continues to push for Harry’s return, it’s apparent that her views are rooted in nostalgia for a bygone era of royal charm.
However, the modern reality for Harry is one of independence and fulfillment outside the confines of royal expectations.
The idea that he would willingly return to the UK to serve the monarchy again feels like a pipe dream.
In the end, Tina Brown’s commentary reflects a longing for the past rather than an understanding of the present.
Harry and Meghan have carved out a new path for themselves, one that prioritizes their happiness and family.
The royal family may need to adapt to this new reality, rather than hoping for a return to what once was.
What remains clear is that the narrative surrounding Harry and Meghan is far more complex than Brown’s simplistic calls for their return.
The royal family must reckon with the consequences of their actions if they wish to mend their fractured relationships.