In a whirlwind of drama that seems never-ending, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again found themselves in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.
The latest episode revolves around the christening of their daughter, Lilibet, which has turned into a spectacle that some might say rivals a circus performance.
With each new revelation, it becomes clearer that this couple is determined to keep their names in the headlines, even if it means making a series of blunders along the way.
Let’s start with the title business.
Suddenly, Lilibet is being referred to as “Princess Lilibet.”
This shift in titles raises eyebrows, especially since the couple has previously distanced themselves from royal formalities.
One moment she’s just Lilibet, and the next, she’s bestowed with a title that feels more like a costume change than an actual designation.
It’s as if they’re playing dress-up with their children’s identities, leaving everyone confused about what’s real and what’s just for show.
But the real kicker comes from their official announcement regarding the christening.
In a statement that should have been straightforward, they claimed that Lilibet was christened by the Archbishop of Los Angeles.
Here’s the catch: there is no Archbishop of Los Angeles.
It’s a glaring oversight that raises questions about their attention to detail.
With an army of public relations experts at their disposal, one would assume that a simple fact-check would be part of the process.
Apparently not.
The irony is palpable, especially considering how often Harry and Meghan have criticized media inaccuracies.
If they want to hold others accountable for getting the facts right, they should probably start with themselves.
As journalist Kate Garraway pointed out, if you’re going to challenge the accuracy of reporting about your own lives, you need to ensure your statements are accurate first.
As it turns out, the actual officiant at the ceremony was Bishop John Harvey Taylor—not an archbishop, but a bishop.
This misstep adds another layer to the ongoing saga.
One can only imagine the conversations behind closed doors in Montecito, where Meghan and Harry seem to prioritize style over substance.
Their choice to go with “Archbishop” instead of the correct title feels more like a desperate attempt to elevate their status rather than a genuine reflection of their reality.
This entire situation also speaks volumes about the couple’s apparent need for attention.
Why announce Lilibet’s christening months after it took place?
Why the sudden push for royal titles?
It all seems like a calculated move to remain relevant in the public eye.
They exhibit behaviors akin to a person who posts vague, dramatic updates on social media, fishing for sympathy and engagement.
And let’s address the elephant in the room: their children.
Harry and Meghan’s kids are rarely seen, leading many to speculate about their existence.
Are they real, or merely props used to garner sympathy?
The mystery surrounding their family life only adds to the absurdity of the situation.
It’s almost as if they’re crafting an elaborate narrative that raises more questions than it answers.
What’s particularly striking is the juxtaposition between Harry and Meghan’s antics and the genuine work being done by other royals.
While William and Kate engage in meaningful royal duties, Harry and Meghan appear to be lost in their own fantasy world.
It’s a stark contrast that could make anyone question the direction of the Sussexes’ public image.
Moreover, this christening debacle reveals how far Harry has strayed from his royal upbringing.
As someone who grew up immersed in royal traditions, he should understand the importance of accuracy and respect for those customs.
Instead, he seems to be caught in a cycle of missteps and embarrassing errors that could easily be avoided.
Meghan, on the other hand, continues to chase a semblance of royal status.
Her desire for recognition seems to overshadow the very essence of what it means to be part of the royal family.
True royalty embodies duty, service, and selflessness—qualities that seem to be lost on her.
The christening itself was held at their home in Montecito, which raises further eyebrows.
Inviting prominent figures such as King Charles and the Cambridges only to have them decline is telling.
Perhaps they were too occupied with their own responsibilities, or maybe they simply chose not to engage with this spectacle.
As we reflect on this latest chapter in the Sussex saga, it’s hard not to draw comparisons to a poorly executed play.
They may have the costumes and the titles, but the execution leaves much to be desired.
The missed opportunities for genuine impact are disappointing, especially given their platform.
So, what comes next for Harry and Meghan?
Will they continue to spin tales that blur the lines between reality and fiction?
As they navigate this complicated landscape, one thing remains clear: their quest for relevance is fraught with pitfalls, and their credibility hangs in the balance.
