In a recent whirlwind visit to Vancouver, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again stirred up controversy.
While many expected them to tackle pressing global issues, they were actually in town to promote the Invictus Games, an initiative close to Harry’s heart.
However, what unfolded during their brief stay has raised eyebrows and led to some serious questions about public spending on the ex-royals.
The Vancouver Police Department reported that the cost of police overtime during Harry and Meghan’s three-day visit reached an astonishing £34,558.
This hefty bill has sparked outrage, especially considering the short duration of their trip.
For the average person, that amount could cover a cozy winter retreat in the Yukon, but it went instead to ensure the couple’s safety while they mingled with fans and supporters.
Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions, let’s clarify that the police claim they weren’t specifically assigned to protect the couple.
Instead, they had officers in the area for general security purposes, which raises the question: do they really do this for every celebrity?
It seems a bit far-fetched, doesn’t it?
One can only imagine how Justin Bieber feels about it.
Adding another layer to the story, Dove Maynard, the head of security for the Invictus Games, insists that taxpayers didn’t foot the bill for the couple’s protection.
He claims that the costs were covered through individual donations.
This raises eyebrows too—who are these generous benefactors willing to shell out thousands for Harry and Meghan’s security?
Are they devoted fans, wealthy philanthropists, or perhaps even Oprah herself, feeling a bit guilty after their famous interview?
Flashback to 2020 when Harry and Meghan first stepped away from royal duties.
At that time, Public Safety Canada announced they would cease providing RCMP protection for the couple.
Fast forward four years, and it appears taxpayers are still indirectly covering expenses related to their various outings.
It’s reminiscent of that friend who moves out yet keeps raiding your fridge.
Let’s not forget that this isn’t the first time Canada has borne the financial burden of protecting the couple.
Between 2019 and 2020, the RCMP reportedly spent over £43,000 on their security during another extended visit.
At this rate, Canada might have spent more on the Sussexes than some families spend on their own relatives.
The irony is palpable: Harry and Meghan have publicly declared their desire to live as private citizens, free from the royal spotlight.
Yet, they seem to expect the same level of security and treatment typically afforded to royals.
It’s akin to quitting a fast-food job but still expecting free meals for life.
While many supporters argue that the Invictus Games serve an important purpose—helping wounded veterans—it’s worth questioning whether such extravagant security expenditures are warranted for promoting a sporting event.
How many local charities could benefit from that £34,558?
The money could have gone towards food banks, educational programs, or shelters, rather than paying officers to stand around while Harry and Meghan basked in the limelight.
This entire scenario highlights the peculiar position Harry and Meghan find themselves in.
They are no longer royals, yet they still cling to the perks that come with that status.
They want the admiration and influence but without the responsibilities and scrutiny that accompany royal life.
It’s a delicate balancing act that seems increasingly untenable.
As Canadians grapple with rising living costs, the optics of spending taxpayer dollars on celebrity security become even more troubling.
Many citizens are struggling to make ends meet, and the idea of funding the lavish lifestyles of former royals feels tone-deaf, if not outright insulting.
Moreover, this situation invites a larger conversation about the relationship between Canada and the British monarchy.
With many Canadians indifferent to the royal family, it begs the question: why should tax dollars support individuals who have distanced themselves from royal obligations?
Perhaps it’s time for a candid discussion regarding the monarchy’s relevance in modern Canadian society.
Despite the mounting criticism, one can’t help but feel a twinge of sympathy for Harry and Meghan.
They sought independence from the royal family but are now learning that celebrity status comes with its own set of challenges.
Transitioning from royals to private citizens isn’t as glamorous as they may have envisioned.
Ultimately, Harry and Meghan must decide what they truly want.
If they wish to embrace a private life, they need to act accordingly—covering their own security and making choices that reflect their new status.
Alternatively, if they prefer the royal lifestyle, perhaps returning to the fold might be the best option.
In any case, the public deserves clarity and accountability from those who once held royal titles.
As this saga unfolds, it raises important questions for all of us.
Are we comfortable supporting the extravagant lifestyles of ex-royals who claim to seek privacy?
Should we continue to fund their security while other public services face budget cuts?
These are critical discussions that demand our attention and engagement.
