GB News Royal Correspondent Cameron Walker has unveiled a startling revelation from an upcoming book penned by none other than Robert Hardman.
Now, let me stress that Hardman is not your run-of-the-mill Royal commentator.
He boasts deep ties within the Royal household, having engaged with both present and past members of the Royal family.
His unparalleled access renders the disclosures he brings to light all the more striking.
As per Walker’s report, the book puts forth an assertion alleging that the late Queen did not endorse Meghan and Harry’s decision to name their daughter Lilibet.
For those not well-versed, Lilibet was a cherished moniker of the Queen within her close circle.
The name held sentimental significance, symbolizing the intimate relationships the Queen held dear.
Opting for the name Lilibet was essentially a tribute to the Queen’s personal and private identity.
Nevertheless, the bombshell moment arrived when, subsequent to the name announcement, a palace insider informed the BBC that the Queen was not consulted regarding the utilization of Lilibet.
This revelation understandably did not sit well with Meghan and Harry, leading their legal team to swiftly dispatch stern legal notices to UK broadcasters and newspapers, denouncing the assertion as baseless and defamatory.
The plot thickens as Meghan and Harry’s spokesperson, at that time, maintained that Prince Harry had indeed sought his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II’s approval beforehand.
They asserted that the choice of the name Lilibet would not have been made without her consent.
However, according to Robert Hardman, it is precisely this claim – that the Duke had sought the Queen’s blessing – which appears to have perturbed the late Queen.
The audacity of implying a conversation with the Queen when she could not confirm or refute it has understandably raised eyebrows.
It is a bold assertion, one that, if unfounded, not only damages Meghan and Harry’s credibility but openly challenges the monarchy’s integrity.
What is truly astonishing here is not just the potential deceit but the notion that the late Queen’s personal sentiments and desires may have been exploited for public consumption.
If the allegations in Hardman’s book prove to be accurate, Meghan and Harry have not only flouted tradition but have seemingly manipulated the Queen’s legacy for their own narrative.
The resounding question reverberating through the esteemed corridors of Buckingham Palace is, How dare they?
How dare they utilize the revered name of the late Queen in a manner that, if substantiated, contradicts her wishes?
How dare they manipulate the narrative, engaging in a perilous game with the Queen’s legacy?
What are your thoughts on this development, folks?
Thank you for tuning in to today’s discourse.
I invite you to share your opinions in the comments section below.
Stay tuned for further updates on the captivating realm of royalty.
Until next time, thank you for your readership.
Anticipate more enthralling news concerning the Royal Family.
