Royal expert Angela Levin recently highlighted that there were more than 30 falsehoods in the controversial interview conducted by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry with Oprah Winfrey.
During the interview, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex took several jabs at the royal family, making serious allegations that have now been called into question.
Levin emphasized that many of the accusations made by the couple against the royal family were unfounded and lacked credibility.
Specifically, she pointed out that Meghan’s claim of numerous pre-marriage conversations about the potential skin color of their future children was highly dubious.
Levin questioned the validity of such discussions occurring before the couple had even tied the knot, labeling it as nonsensical and baseless.
Furthermore, the royal expert dismissed the notion that Meghan and Harry deserved any accolades or recognition for the Oprah interview, stating that it lacked substantial evidence to support their claims.
She criticized the couple for leveraging their fame and fortune, which she attributed to their association with the royal family, to advance their own agenda without sufficient justification.
In response to Meghan’s revelations about her struggles with mental health, Levin expressed skepticism regarding the palace’s responsibility for her emotional well-being.
While acknowledging the seriousness of depression, she refuted the idea that the royal institution should bear the blame for Meghan’s personal challenges, denouncing their behavior as ungrateful and immature.
The bombshell interview had stirred controversy with Meghan alleging that discussions had occurred within the royal family about the potential skin tone of her unborn child.
These claims have sparked widespread debate and raised questions about the veracity of the couple’s statements during the highly publicized interview.
As the public continues to dissect the revelations made by Meghan and Harry, opinions are divided on the credibility of their assertions.
Some believe that the couple’s criticisms of the royal family are justified, while others question the motives behind their incendiary comments and the lack of concrete evidence to support their claims.
Related Stories
