Prince Harry’s life post his and Meghan’s decision to step back from their senior royal roles has been a rollercoaster ride.
Amidst subtle criticisms aimed at the royal family since their departure, a royal historian recently shed light on a moment that led the late Queen to respond to her grandson and his wife.
Prince Harry, keen on shielding his children – Archie and Lilibet – from the public eye, rarely discloses much about his little ones.
However, recent revelations have stirred controversy around the royal roots of Archie and Lilibet.
Tom Bowell’s remarks highlighted the Harkles’ strict control over who gets to see images of their children, emphasizing their guarded approach towards privacy.
Speculations arose when snippets of a phone conversation hinted at the couple’s efforts to keep their children out of the spotlight while allegedly spreading misinformation about them.
Reports claim that the Queen never had the opportunity to meet Archie and Lilibet, raising questions about their lineage.
The discussion surrounding surrogacy adds a layer of complexity to the situation, as it could potentially impact the children’s eligibility for the line of succession.
Allegations of using a surrogate, coupled with discrepancies in birth details and public appearances, fuel suspicions that the Sussexes might be concealing crucial information that could challenge the children’s royal claims.
The secrecy surrounding Archie’s identity and the couple’s commercial endeavors under their own trademark further stirred controversy within the royal circles.
Not seeking consent from the late monarch before embarking on commercial ventures marked a significant misstep for Harry and Meghan.
Their decision to trademark products without consulting the Queen not only strained their relationship with the crown but also raised concerns about their autonomy within the royal framework.
While other royals engage in commercial activities, the Sussexes’ independent approach without royal approval sparked tensions behind palace walls.
Despite the Queen’s initial support for the couple and her appreciation of Meghan’s inclusive influence on the royal family, matters of authority and protocol remained non-negotiable.
The clash over commercializing the royal brand underscored the boundaries that the Sussexes inadvertently crossed.
The monarch’s disappointment over Harry’s failure to seek her endorsement for their merchandise line reflected a breach of trust and respect for the crown’s prerogatives.
As the saga unfolds, it becomes evident that the dynamics between the Sussexes and the royal establishment are fraught with complexities and power struggles.
The revelations surrounding Archie and Lilibet’s royal status, coupled with the unauthorized commercial ventures, paint a picture of discord within the Windsor family.
The Queen’s firm stance on upholding the crown’s authority serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between personal aspirations and royal obligations in the tumultuous world of monarchy.
Related Stories
