The Curious Case of Archie Harrison
Something feels off about the royal family’s portrayal of Archie Harrison, and many are starting to notice.
From the peculiar proportions in photographs to the odd lighting, there’s a sense that something isn’t quite right.
Imagine a Norman Rockwell painting gone awry—this is the vibe many are picking up.
Initially, one might chalk it up to the quirks of British royalty, but as suspicions grow, it seems there may be more to the story than meets the eye.
Reports have emerged suggesting that the images of Archie were manipulated, with claims that individuals were “copy-pasted” from other portraits.
Take Kate Middleton, for instance.
While undeniably beautiful, her face appears asymmetrical in these photos, raising eyebrows about their authenticity.
A source close to the situation noted that Kate, with her experience, found it strange that Archie, at just two years old, looked significantly older than his age.
Moreover, Meghan Markle‘s unconventional way of holding Archie has also raised concerns.
Observers noted that her grip seemed uncomfortable for the child, leading to questions about why he remained calm during the ceremony.
Typically, a baby held in such a manner would likely cry out in discomfort, yet Archie was oddly quiet throughout.
Adding to the intrigue, Meghan reportedly requested that the royal photographer send her all the images privately before they were shared with the palace.
This raises some eyebrows—what could she possibly want to edit before the public sees them?
Many speculate that this could be an attempt to conceal evidence that might suggest Archie isn’t who he’s claimed to be.
The skepticism doesn’t end there.
Critics have pointed out discrepancies in the timeline surrounding Archie’s birth.
For example, the original dates on the photos don’t align with Harry and Meghan’s narrative.
Observers argue that Archie appears to be much older than a mere two months in the pictures, especially since he seems capable of holding his own head up—a skill typically developed later.
Further examination of the christening photos reveals even more inconsistencies.
Some images supposedly featuring Archie appear to have been digitally altered, with one notable picture showing a striking similarity to a past photo of Prince Harry on Princess Diana‘s lap.
The color coordination and positioning seem too coincidental to ignore.
Additionally, Meghan’s wardrobe choices have sparked debate.
In one photograph, she wears the same dress and hat that she donned for Archie’s christening, while Harry sported a grey suit that looks eerily familiar.
Such repetitions raise questions about the authenticity of these moments and whether they were staged.
As if that weren’t enough, the official announcements regarding Archie’s birth were notably peculiar.
On May 6, 2019, news broke that Meghan had gone into labor early that morning, only for reports to follow shortly after, declaring the birth took place at 5:26 AM.
The wording in these announcements was also unusual, with phrases like “the Duchess of Sussex had been delivered of a son,” rather than the more standard “she delivered a son.”
Even more baffling is the lack of standard details typically included in royal births, such as the doctor’s signature or specifics about the delivery location.
These omissions stand in stark contrast to the comprehensive information usually provided for the Cambridge children, further fueling speculation.
When Harry presented Archie to the press just two days after his birth, he was asked whom the baby resembled.
