A private investigator has expressed regret for his actions targeting Chelsea Davy, the former girlfriend of the Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry.
In a recent interview with the BBC, investigator Gavin Burrows acknowledged the ruthless pursuit of headlines by the press at the expense of individuals like Davy.
He criticized the lack of morals displayed by the media during their coverage of Prince Harry, comparing him to Princess Diana in the 2000s.
Burrows revealed that editors had instructed him to focus on Prince Harry, claiming that featuring him on the front page boosted newspaper sales more than his brother, Prince William.
When Chelsea Davy entered the picture as Prince Harry’s girlfriend in 2004, she became a prime target for surveillance and hacking activities, according to Burrows.
Her communications were intercepted, voicemails hacked, and personal information scrutinized.
The extent of the intrusion into Davy’s life included interests in her medical records, past relationships, and educational background.
Burrows highlighted the invasive nature of the investigations, shedding light on the lengths some media outlets would go to in pursuit of sensational stories.
The involvement of individuals like Clive Goodman, the former royal editor of News of the World, in phone hacking scandals further underscored the breach of privacy experienced by individuals close to the royal family.
Former BBC royal correspondent Peter Hunt emphasized the impact of such violations on the princes, noting their initial attempts to address the issues with the publishers.
However, Prince Harry’s continued pursuit of justice in the face of media maltreatment sets him apart from Prince William, according to experts.
The differing approaches of the two brothers towards media engagement reflect a deeper divide in their perceptions and experiences with the press.
Royal correspondent Johnny Diamond delved into the contrasting attitudes of Prince William and Prince Harry towards the media, highlighting William’s understanding of the importance of media relations for conveying messages effectively.
In contrast, Harry’s deep-seated resentment towards the press, especially tabloids, stems from his perception of their role in his mother’s tragic death.
The strained relationship between the brothers, exacerbated by the establishment of separate households and communication teams, suggests a further deterioration in their bond.
As the dynamics within the royal family continue to evolve, the rift between Prince Harry and Prince William appears increasingly challenging to mend.
The implications of their diverging approaches to media scrutiny and public engagements underscore a fundamental shift in their roles and responsibilities within the monarchy.
The repercussions of past intrusions and ongoing tensions may shape the future interactions between the royal siblings, setting a precedent for their individual paths forward.
Related Stories
