In the wake of Prince Harry‘s significant legal victory against media giant Murdoch, all eyes have turned to Prince William.
Observers couldn’t help but anticipate a response from the Duke of Cambridge, and it seems their instincts were spot on.
An article published in the iPaper has emerged, detailing what it describes as Prince William’s covert struggle against media intrusion.
This piece, penned by Richard Palmer, suggests that while Harry has dominated headlines with his fight against the British press, William is quietly battling to shield his family from similar intrusions amid an era defined by sensationalism and social media.
It’s hard to ignore the timing of this article.
Many speculate that it was directly influenced by Harry’s recent triumph, with some suggesting that the palace may have orchestrated its release to counterbalance Harry’s narrative.
The jealousy within royal circles appears palpable; Harry’s success has put a spotlight on William, prompting a desperate attempt to align himself with his brother’s fight against media scrutiny.
But let’s be real—when has Prince William ever genuinely taken on the press?
Historically, William has been known to cozy up to major media outlets, including those owned by Rupert Murdoch.
In fact, he accepted a substantial payout from Murdoch in 2020, a detail that surfaced during Harry’s court case earlier this year.
This raises a troubling question about William’s integrity when he publicly downplays his family’s history with the very media that contributed to his mother Princess Diana‘s tragic fate.
It’s a stark contrast to Harry’s stance, who refuses to engage with the same outlets that played a role in his mother’s death, making his position a powerful statement.
William’s recent attempts to portray himself as a defender against media intrusion seem insincere at best.
How can he claim to be fighting the same press that he collaborates with?
His actions suggest otherwise, particularly since he has often used the media to bolster his own image while vilifying Harry and Meghan.
It’s a classic case of playing both sides to maintain a favorable public persona.
Royal expert Robert Johnson weighed in on the situation, confirming suspicions that Kensington Palace has been leaking information to the press.
He noted that while the royals may deny these claims, there has been a significant amount of information flowing from their end.
This contradicts William’s recent narrative, painting him as a victim rather than a participant in the ongoing media circus.
The article from Richard Palmer further complicates the narrative, claiming that despite their differences, both brothers share a mutual distrust of the media.
However, this assertion raises eyebrows.
It seems more like a feeble attempt to create common ground where none exists.
Harry is actively seeking accountability for past wrongs, while William appears content to maintain the status quo—an arrangement that benefits him and his public image.
As the piece continues, it mentions that William and Kate may have celebrated Harry’s settlement with the Sun, but it’s likely not for the reasons one might think.
Their relief likely stems from the fear of their own secrets being exposed in court, rather than any genuine support for Harry’s victory.
If William truly cared about justice, he would have taken a stand against the media long before now.
Palmer’s article also suggests that while Harry has taken a bold approach to address past grievances, William prefers a more subdued strategy.
Yet, this “strategy” seems to boil down to continuing his collaboration with the press.
Without that support, William would be left vulnerable, and he knows it.
The idea that he could suddenly turn against the very outlets that have propped him up is laughable.
Ultimately, this situation illustrates a fundamental divide between the two brothers.
Harry’s refusal to engage with the media that harmed his family stands in stark contrast to William’s dependence on those same outlets.
The narrative being pushed by the palace and its allies is an attempt to reshape public perception, but the reality is far less flattering for William.
As the saga unfolds, it remains to be seen how the public will react to these contrasting approaches.
Will they continue to buy into the narrative that William is a champion against media intrusion, or will they see through the facade?
One thing is clear: the dynamics within the royal family are as complex as ever, and the battle for public opinion is far from over.
Related Stories
