In a twist that hardly surprises anyone, Prince Harry‘s forthcoming polo documentary appears to be falling flat with Netflix executives.
As the streaming giant finally got a glimpse of the series, sources have revealed their discontent, particularly about Harry’s minimal presence in the project.
According to reports from outlets like the Daily Mail and Page Six, this documentary, which is set to air in December, has turned out to be more about Harry’s friend, Nacho Figueras, than about the Duke himself.
It seems that Harry has taken a backseat in what many expected to be his show.
Instead, the focus is primarily on Figueras, an Argentine professional polo player.
This shift has reportedly left Netflix feeling shortchanged, as they anticipated a significant spotlight on Harry.
Given the context of the documentary, one would naturally assume the Duke would feature prominently, but it turns out that’s not the case at all.
The insider comments suggest that without Harry’s involvement, the appeal of the documentary is severely diminished.
Netflix has invested heavily in the Sussexes, especially following the drama surrounding their exit from royal duties.
However, feedback from insiders indicates that most of their subsequent projects have underperformed.
The expectation was that a documentary centered around polo—often dubbed the “sport of kings”—would be compelling enough to attract viewers, especially with Harry’s name attached.
But with him sidelined, the prospects look bleak.
The title “Nacho Show” has even been floated among Netflix executives, highlighting the frustration with the final edit, which was overseen by Harry and Meghan.
They had hoped for a more engaging narrative, but it seems the finished product does not deliver.
As the clock ticks down to the premiere, it’s clear that the stakes are high; Netflix’s deal with the couple expires next year, and they need a hit to justify their investment.
In the meantime, Harry has been making headlines for other reasons.
He recently attended the WellChild Awards in London, marking his seventh public appearance without Meghan in just a week.
While he was there to present awards to seriously ill children—a cause he has supported for years—there was no meeting with his father, King Charles, or his brother, Prince William, during this visit.
Surprisingly, the king is currently in Scotland, and Harry’s absence from family gatherings continues to raise eyebrows.
Despite the ongoing family rift, Harry has been busy juggling a hectic travel schedule.
His recent appearances include five speeches in New York and a guest spot on “The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon,” which received mixed reviews.
Some critics found the late-night appearance to be lackluster, questioning whether Harry’s humor and charm truly shone through during the segment.
Amidst these public engagements, Harry has expressed his admiration for the tiny nation of Lesotho, calling it a “home away from home.” He reflected on the kindness he has received from its royal family over the past two decades.
Yet, his travel plans are now subject to scrutiny, as he must provide advance notice for security assessments due to his previous claims of inadequate protection.
Interestingly, Harry opted not to stay at any royal residence during his London visit, raising speculation about his relationship with the royal family.
Reports indicate he chose to stay with Earl Spencer, Princess Diana‘s brother, instead of accepting an invitation to Buckingham Palace.
This decision further emphasizes the ongoing tensions within the family since his departure from royal duties.
As Harry navigates his charitable efforts, the juxtaposition of his public persona and personal life continues to draw attention.
His commitment to the WellChild Awards is commendable, yet some wonder why he doesn’t involve Meghan and their children in these significant events.
Critics argue that their absence could be a missed opportunity for positive publicity, especially for causes that resonate deeply.
With the polo documentary looming on the horizon, the question remains: will it resonate with audiences?
The concept of a polo documentary could have potential, but the choice to minimize Harry’s role raises eyebrows.
As anticipation builds for its December release, both fans and critics are eager to see how it unfolds.
As we await the premiere, the unfolding saga of Prince Harry’s endeavors—both in entertainment and charity—remains a topic of discussion.
The narrative surrounding his life continues to evolve, leaving many wondering what the future holds for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in the ever-watchful eyes of the public.
Related Stories
