The decision by Prince Harry to keep his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, in the United States has reignited a wave of criticism.
Many royal commentators are weighing in, suggesting that this choice might be part of a larger strategy.
Speculation is rife that Harry could be intentionally distancing his kids from the royal family as a bargaining chip in ongoing discussions about their security and future roles.
This debate underscores the escalating tensions between Harry and the royal family, tensions that have been simmering since he and Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties in 2020.
Arthur Edwards, a prominent royal photographer, didn’t hold back during a recent segment on Royal Exclusive.
He labeled Harry as “foolish” for keeping his children away from their royal heritage, arguing that Archie and Lilibet deserve the chance to connect with their lineage.
Edwards believes that Harry’s actions could hinder his children’s relationship with the British monarchy.
However, not everyone shares this critical view.
Insiders close to Harry are defending his choices, emphasizing that the safety of his family is his utmost priority.
A source speaking to Hello!
revealed that Harry’s main concern revolves around ensuring adequate protection for his children before they even consider a trip to the UK.
This source clarified that Harry’s aim is straightforward: he wants to establish proper security arrangements so that his kids can maintain ties to their homeland without any risk to their safety.
Yet, there are those who interpret Harry’s actions differently.
Matt Wilkinson, the royal editor at The Sun, suggested that Harry’s insistence on security could be a calculated maneuver.
Wilkinson speculated that by keeping his children away, Harry might be sending a clear message to the royal family: “No security, no access to the grandchildren.” This perspective has ignited heated debates about whether Harry is using security concerns as a form of leverage in his negotiations with the royals.
Taking it a step further, Wilkinson likened Harry’s stance to a form of blackmail.
He argued that Harry’s decision to withhold his children until security issues are resolved resembles an ultimatum to the royal family.
Essentially, Harry seems to be saying, “If I don’t get the security I need, then you won’t see your grandchildren.”
This interpretation has added fuel to the already intricate discussions surrounding Harry and Meghan’s relationship with the royal family.
Since stepping down from their royal duties, the couple has carved out a new life in California.
However, unresolved security matters and their ties to the monarchy continue to create friction.
As the situation unfolds, questions linger about how Archie and Lilibet will connect with their royal heritage, especially against the backdrop of these persistent security concerns.
The uncertainty surrounding their future interactions with the royal family remains a hot topic.
Related Stories
