Prince Harry’s upcoming memoir, titled Spare, has ignited a firestorm of controversy with explosive revelations about the royal family.
In a candid account, he delves into his experiences within the monarchy and the pivotal decision to step back from his royal duties three years ago.
While Prince Harry and Meghan Markle voluntarily relinquished their HRH status upon their departure, they retained their titles as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
A recent poll conducted by Express.co.uk revealed a strong sentiment among readers advocating for Prince Harry to be stripped of his titles.
The public outcry intensified following British conservative commentator Niall Gardiner’s impassioned plea on Twitter, asserting that the couple’s actions constitute a betrayal of the British people.
Gardiner condemned Harry and Meghan as the most unpopular and distrusted figures in the modern history of the British monarchy.
Conservative MP Bob Seeley is spearheading efforts to introduce a private member’s bill aimed at amending the 1917 Titles Deprivation Act.
This proposed legislation could potentially result in the removal of Prince Harry and Meghan’s prestigious titles.
The poll conducted by Express.co.uk overwhelmingly favored stripping Prince Harry of his titles, with a staggering 97% of respondents in agreement.
Numerous readers echoed the sentiment that Prince Harry should face consequences for his actions, with many advocating for the revocation of all his titles and privileges.
Some even suggested that he should be excluded from the line of succession, despite currently holding the fifth position behind Prince William and his children.
Royal protocol dictates that Prince Harry’s children, Archie and Lilibet, are entitled to HRH titles as grandchildren of the monarch.
However, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams cast doubt on whether they will receive such titles in light of the recent controversies surrounding the family.
The prospect of Archie and Lilibet being granted royal titles remains uncertain, raising questions about their future within the monarchy.
In a recent interview with Anderson Cooper on CBS 60 Minutes, Prince Harry appeared indifferent to the possibility of relinquishing his titles, questioning the significance of such a move.
Historian David Starkey expressed a contrasting view, arguing against stripping Prince Harry of his titles, citing concerns about inadvertently fueling further attention towards him.
Despite King Charles III lacking the authority to unilaterally revoke titles, the process of amending existing laws through parliamentary action remains a viable avenue for addressing the issue.
The fate of the Sussex dukedom ultimately hinges on legislative decisions rather than royal prerogative, underscoring the complexities surrounding this contentious debate.
As the debate surrounding Prince Harry’s titles intensifies, the public discourse reflects a divided sentiment on the appropriate course of action.
The evolving dynamics within the royal family continue to captivate audiences worldwide, prompting speculation about the future trajectory of Prince Harry and Meghan’s standing within the monarchy.
The ongoing saga involving Prince Harry’s titles underscores the enduring fascination with the British royal family and the intricate web of traditions and protocols that govern their roles.
As the narrative unfolds, the public remains engaged in discussions about the implications of potential title-stripping and its broader implications for the monarchy.
