Prince Harry has come under fire from a royal expert who criticized his approach to discussing his relationship with the royal family.
Kinsey Schofield, a prominent figure in royal commentary, expressed her disapproval of Harry’s decision to address his grievances in what she described as the harshest and most disrespectful manner possible.
She suggested that Harry could have dealt with his emotions surrounding the loss of his mother, Princess Diana, in a more constructive manner, rather than choosing to divulge intimate details in a tell-all memoir.
The controversy surrounding Prince Harry escalated further when it was revealed that his legal battle for police protection during his visits to the UK has incurred significant costs to taxpayers.
Reports indicate that the expenses have already amounted to £300,000, as the Duke sought judicial review at the High Court following the withdrawal of his armed security upon relinquishing his royal duties.
During a heated debate on TalkTV’s Jeremy Carr Live, Kinsey Schofield and historian Dr. Tessa Dunlop engaged in a spirited discussion regarding Prince Harry’s financial endeavors.
Dr. Dunlop defended Harry’s decision to profit from his personal experiences, citing his memoir as a legitimate means of income generation.
In contrast, Kinsey Schofield proposed that Harry explore alternative avenues, such as becoming a motivational speaker to share his journey of coping with grief.
Criticism of Prince Harry’s actions extended to former royal correspondent Michael Cole, who questioned the rationale behind Harry’s legal pursuits for security funding.
Cole argued that since Harry and his family are no longer actively fulfilling royal obligations, it is unjustifiable for them to expect financial support for police protection in the UK.
He emphasized that as detached members of the royal family, they should not rely on public resources for personal security measures.
Prince Harry’s legal battle against the Home Office is scheduled to be deliberated at the High Court in April, with a verdict unlikely to be reached before the anticipated coronation of his father, King Charles III, on May 6.
The impending royal event, set to span three days and mark a national holiday in the UK, poses uncertainty regarding Harry and his wife’s attendance.
Related Stories
