Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is facing backlash for his recent decision to wear UK Participation Medals while presenting an award to a top-performing American soldier.
The 39-year-old royal wore a collection of medals on his jacket as he named Combat Medic Sergeant, First Class Elizabeth Marks, the Military Time Soldier of the Year.
Among the medals were three commemorating his grandmother’s jubilees this century, but notably absent was the coronation medal received during King Charles‘ formal ascension last May.
Royal observers were quick to point out the missing coronation medal, suggesting it could be interpreted as a snub to his father.
Despite the significance of the medals worn by Harry, social media critics labeled them as Participation Medals and questioned why he was chosen for the prestigious role.
Some expressed disappointment that an American veteran was not selected for the task.
However, supporters highlighted Sergeant First Class Elizabeth Marks’ participation in the Invictus Games, an event founded by Prince Harry for wounded servicemen and women.
This connection added a special touch to the award presentation, with one social media user recalling her involvement in the 2016 games.
While some defended Prince Harry’s choice of attire, citing his service in Afghanistan and the late Queen’s Jubilees, others criticized the decision as embarrassing and attention-seeking.
The absence of the Coronation Medal led royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams to suggest that Harry may be intentionally distancing himself from his royal past as he settles in the United States permanently.
Following his withdrawal from royal duties, Prince Harry was not permitted to attend last year’s coronation festivities in military attire, a privilege reserved for working members of the royal family.
Commentator Mr. Fitzwilliams emphasized the deliberate nature of the Duke’s actions, indicating a strategic move to underscore his separation from the royal household.
Representatives for Prince Harry declined to comment on the matter when approached by Mail Online.
The Coronation Medal, bearing the effigy of King Charles and Queen Camilla, holds symbolic significance, with the absence of it on Harry’s chest potentially signaling a deliberate choice to distance himself further from the monarchy.
During the award presentation, Prince Harry wore his Operational Service Medal from his time in the Armed Forces and the three Jubilee Medals celebrating Queen Elizabeth II’s milestones.
His decision to display these medals was seen as a nod to his military background, which played a pivotal role during his time as a senior working royal.
In a carefully orchestrated appearance, Prince Harry delivered a heartfelt message from his Montecito residence, praising Sgt.
1st Class Elizabeth Marks for her courage and resilience.
Marks, a decorated athlete and military personnel, overcame significant challenges, embodying the spirit of determination and compassion within the service community.
Prince Harry’s tribute to Marks highlighted her inspirational journey and unwavering commitment to excellence.
By acknowledging her achievements and perseverance, Harry aimed to shine a light on the remarkable individuals within the armed forces who exemplify courage and fortitude in the face of adversity.
Related Stories
