The palace has taken a firm stance against Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan, warning that they will not tolerate any false or misleading statements made by the couple or their supporters about the royal family.
The recent conflict arose when questions surfaced regarding the couple’s decision to name their daughter Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor without prior consultation with Queen Elizabeth II.
In response to reports that the Queen was not informed in advance, Harry threatened legal action against the BBC, which had initially reported the news.
Palace aides, when questioned by ITV, did not refute the claims made by the BBC.
The latest developments indicate a shift in the palace’s approach, signaling a willingness to engage more actively in disputes with the Sussexes.
This move aims to prevent Harry and Meghan from controlling the narrative surrounding their strained relationship with the royal family.
Insider sources suggest that the palace’s recent warning to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex could have significant implications, potentially altering the dynamics of their ongoing feud.
Speculations have circulated that Harry and Meghan intended to have Lilibet christened at Windsor, mirroring the christening of their son Archie.
Reports also suggested that the couple wished to hold the ceremony in the presence of Queen Elizabeth.
However, recent insights from royal sources dismiss these claims, hinting that the Sussexes may opt for a private christening in California instead.
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams noted that contrary to earlier speculations, the christening is likely to take place in Meghan’s home state, emphasizing privacy over public scrutiny, unlike Archie’s controversial christening.
Despite the potential optics of a UK christening for Lilibet, tensions between Harry, Meghan, and the royal family remain palpable.
Analysts argue that a ceremony in the UK could serve as a symbolic gesture to mend strained relations.
However, with unresolved issues stemming from the Oprah interview and subsequent controversies, the prospect of a UK christening seems uncertain.
Speculation persists as to whether the royal family has expressed preferences for the christening’s location, given the significance of the UK as the head of the Church of England.
Criticism towards Harry and Meghan escalated following the secrecy surrounding Archie’s birth and christening.
The couple’s decision to withhold details from the public, including the names of Archie’s godparents, drew criticism and strained their relationship with the British media.
The contrast with Prince William and Catherine, who embraced public traditions during their children’s christenings, further fueled discontent among media outlets in the UK.
Royal expert Fitzwilliams highlighted the negative impact of the couple’s secretive approach on their public image and media relations.
Looking ahead, uncertainties loom over the location of Lilibet’s christening, with conflicting views on whether the event will take place in the UK or the US.
While historical ties and religious considerations may favor a UK ceremony, the Sussexes’ past experiences and desire for privacy could sway the decision in favor of a Californian christening.
As discussions unfold within the royal family and among experts, the final choice remains elusive.
Amidst ongoing tensions and unresolved issues, the decision regarding Lilibet’s christening location could carry significant implications for Harry, Meghan, and their relationship with the royal family.
Related Stories
