A surprising revelation has emerged from the inner workings of the royal palace, shedding light on a shady incident involving Meghan Markle‘s mother, Doria Ragland.
It all started back in September 2018 when Doria Ragland made a surprise appearance at a luncheon held on Perks Field outside Kensington Palace.
The occasion was to commemorate the launch of the new cookbook, “Together: Our Community Kitchen,” with Meghan Markle at the helm.
Following the luncheon, Meghan Markle reportedly made a special request to the palace staff to have a VIP room prepared for her mother, Doria, every time she visited the UK.
However, this seemingly innocent request hit a roadblock when it was revealed that the spare room, known as the Windsor suite, was reserved exclusively for royals.
Despite Meghan’s insistence, the Queen intervened and denied access to Doria Ragland, citing protocol.
Sources close to the palace recently leaked information suggesting that there may have been ulterior motives behind Meghan’s push to grant her mother access to the prestigious Windsor suite.
Allegations surfaced that Meghan justified her demand by claiming that Kate Middleton‘s family had previously utilized the suite during their travels.
However, investigations revealed this to be untrue, raising suspicions about Meghan’s true intentions.
The situation took a darker turn when the palace experienced its first burglary in years while both Doria and Meghan were present.
The burglary appeared to be meticulously planned, with the perpetrator having inside knowledge of the palace layout, guard schedules, and the location of valuable items.
Speculations arose that the thief either had prior knowledge of the items’ worth or was paid to carry out the theft, hinting at a deeper conspiracy.
Amidst these troubling events, Prince Harry‘s involvement in advocating for International Privileged Person (IPP) status for himself, Meghan, and Doria Ragland came to the forefront.
Questions were raised about the necessity of such a status, with concerns shifting from mere security to potential unchecked privileges and hidden agendas.
Harry’s unwavering support for his wife and mother seemed to stem from a desire to protect them from unknown threats lurking within royal circles.
As the controversy unfolded, a new report surfaced criticizing Meghan Markle’s commitment to feminism.
Despite her self-professed title as a feminist and champion of human rights and gender equity, doubts were cast on the authenticity of her advocacy.
Royal expert Angela Levin voiced skepticism about Meghan’s claims, suggesting that her marriage to Prince Harry and subsequent wealth accumulation contradicted her supposed feminist values.
The unveiling of the updated Sussex.com website, featuring profiles of Harry and Meghan, aimed to showcase their philanthropic endeavors and global influence.
Meghan’s accolades as one of the world’s most influential women, as recognized by prestigious publications, painted a picture of a dedicated advocate for women’s empowerment.
However, critics like Angela Levin challenged this narrative, accusing Meghan of leveraging her royal connections for personal gain rather than genuine activism.
Related Stories
