Investigative journalist Tom Bauer is back in the spotlight, stirring up controversy with his latest report that challenges the public narrative surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.
His findings raise serious questions about their two children, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor.
According to Bauer, there’s a striking lack of verifiable evidence supporting the existence of the couple’s kids, aside from a series of carefully staged images and controlled appearances.
Bauer’s investigation reveals a significant absence of traceable documentation, prompting intense speculation about why Meghan and Harry seem to go to great lengths to keep their children’s lives shrouded in secrecy.
While the couple has consistently portrayed themselves as a happy family, they have been far less open than other royals, particularly when compared to Prince William and Princess Kate, who have shared candid glimpses of their own children.
The Sussexes’ approach to privacy raises eyebrows, especially given the traditional royal protocols surrounding births.
Official birth records for Archie and Lilibet remain largely undisclosed, and inconsistencies in their stories only fuel further speculation.
Bauer notes that royal births typically involve a well-documented process, including hospital records, witnesses, and public announcements, yet these crucial details are notably absent in the case of Meghan and Harry’s children.
Delving deeper, Bauer scrutinizes the supposed birthplaces of Archie and Lilibet.
Reports claim that Archie was born at Portland Hospital in London, but evidence supporting this assertion is lacking.
Unlike other royal births, there wasn’t a public announcement outside the hospital, nor have any medical personnel stepped forward to confirm the event.
This starkly contrasts with the highly publicized arrivals of Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, where there was ample photographic proof and statements from medical professionals.
Lilibet’s case is even more perplexing.
Allegedly born in Santa Barbara, California, her birth reportedly took place under strict hospital record-keeping laws.
Yet, no legitimate hospital or staff member has corroborated Meghan’s presence during the delivery.
Eyewitness accounts are absent, and the media statement released offers little clarity, leaving a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the situation.
Another intriguing aspect of Bauer’s findings is the absence of natural, candid images of Archie and Lilibet.
Every publicly available photo seems heavily staged or edited, lacking the authenticity seen in the spontaneous snapshots of other royal children.
While Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis have been documented growing up through various informal images, the Sussex children appear only in a series of carefully curated pictures.
Even birthday photos fail to provide a convincing timeline of Archie and Lilibet’s development, leading many to question their authenticity.
This raises eyebrows about why Meghan and Harry have opted for such a tightly controlled visual narrative when other royal families embrace a more open approach.
Bauer also uncovers the extreme measures taken by Meghan Markle to prevent independent journalists and photographers from investigating further.
Reports suggest that she employs legal threats, orchestrates media blackouts, and curates public appearances to suppress any inquiries into her family life.
Those who have dared to challenge the narrative surrounding the children have faced considerable pressure, indicating that Meghan maintains a legal team ready to combat any unwanted scrutiny.
The troubling gaps in documentation, coupled with the highly controlled public appearances, beg the question: If there’s nothing to hide, why has there been such resistance to verifying the children’s births and existence?
