In a recent tour of Colombia, Meghan Markle has reportedly stirred up a storm, demanding that staff and organizers refer to her solely as “Madam.”
This insistence on strict protocol has raised eyebrows and ignited discussions about the performative nature of the Sussexes’ public life.
According to royal expert Neil Sean, this incident reflects a deeper desire to assert her authority, even during what was meant to be a diplomatic engagement.
Critics have been quick to pounce on Meghan’s behavior, questioning whether it aligns with the image of humility and compassion that she and Prince Harry have worked hard to project.
One royal commentator, who chose to remain anonymous, noted, “This is a far cry from the Meghan we’re used to seeing, the one who claims to be all about empowerment and equality.” Instead of shining a light on their charitable endeavors, the focus has shifted to Meghan’s seemingly diva-like demands.
The Colombia trip was intended to highlight the Sussexes’ commitment to various causes, but now it’s overshadowed by controversy.
The narrative has taken a turn away from the important work they aimed to promote, with many now fixated on Meghan’s insistence on being treated with elevated respect.
The commentator lamented how this shift detracts from the couple’s mission.
This isn’t the first time Meghan has faced allegations of entitlement.
Past reports have detailed her clashes with palace staff over trivial matters, such as her preference for a specific type of avocado toast.
These instances have only fueled the perception that she prioritizes her image over meaningful contributions.
A former palace insider expressed disappointment, saying, “Meghan has the potential to be a powerful force for good, but her need for constant validation seems to be getting in the way.”
The uproar surrounding Meghan’s conduct in Colombia has reignited a larger conversation about the royal family’s place in contemporary society.
Many argue that the Sussexes’ strict adherence to royal protocols clashes with the public’s desire for a monarchy that feels relatable and accessible.
“The public wants to see a royal family that is in touch with the people, not one that constantly demands deference,” remarked a royal watcher, who also preferred to stay unnamed.
On the other hand, supporters of the Sussexes contend that maintaining strict protocols is essential for upholding the dignity of the monarchy.
A spokesperson for the couple defended their actions, stating, “These are centuries-old customs that serve an important purpose.
It’s not about ego or diva behavior; it’s about respecting the institution.”
Despite these justifications, the incident has further strained public trust in Meghan and Prince Harry.
The couple has long branded themselves as advocates for social justice and equality, yet they now find themselves at the center of a controversy that appears to contradict those values.
The disconnect between their public persona and private actions continues to raise questions among observers.
