Meghan Markle’s choice of monogram, featuring a crown above the letter M, has stirred up a debate among royal enthusiasts.
The revelation of the Duchess’s handwritten note showcasing this new cypher has left royal biographer Angela Levin unimpressed.
In an interview with The Sun, Levin expressed her disapproval, suggesting that Markle’s use of the crown symbolizes a desire for prestige and autonomy.
According to Levin, Markle’s actions indicate a reluctance to conform to traditional royal expectations, as she continues to assert her independence even after stepping back from her official duties in 2020.
Levin further criticized Markle for not adhering to any agreements made with the royal family upon her departure.
Despite the supposed understanding that she would no longer use royal insignia, Markle persists in incorporating the crown into her personal branding.
Levin speculated on Markle’s motivations, questioning her lack of gratitude towards the royal family for the opportunities and status they have afforded her.
She suggested that Markle values the prestige associated with her titles, using them as a means to enhance her public image and maintain relevance in the public eye.
The biographer highlighted Markle’s affinity for celebrity circles, wealth, and global influence, implying that these factors drive her decisions regarding her public persona.
By prominently featuring the crown in her professional endeavors, Markle aims to project an image of power and sophistication to a worldwide audience.
Levin characterized this behavior as a form of self-promotion, emphasizing Markle’s strategic use of symbolism to cultivate a favorable impression among her admirers and critics alike.
Levin’s commentary underscores a broader discussion about Markle’s evolving relationship with her royal identity and the public perception of her post-royal life.
The ongoing scrutiny surrounding Markle’s actions reflects a deeper fascination with the intersection of tradition and modernity within the British monarchy.
As Markle navigates her newfound role outside the confines of royal protocol, her choices continue to spark debate and speculation among royal watchers and commentators.
In light of these developments, it remains to be seen how the palace will respond to Markle’s unconventional approach to royal symbolism and personal branding.
While some may view her actions as a calculated strategy to maintain relevance and influence, others may interpret them as a departure from established norms and expectations.