In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle‘s attempt to trademark “American Riviera Orchard” has hit a wall, and the rejection letter is nothing short of entertaining.
Thanks to a fellow Altonerd, we now have insight into the legal mishaps surrounding her application, and trust me, it’s a wild ride.
Let’s dive into the details and share a few laughs along the way.
Steph, known as the Altonerd, brings us the scoop on this royal blunder.
In her latest update, she reveals the five key issues that the trademark office raised about Meghan’s application.
Spoiler alert: it’s a lot more complicated than just a simple no.
The first issue?
A requirement to disclaim descriptive wording.
Essentially, the trademark office told Meghan that she can’t lay claim to “American Riviera” or “Orchard” because they are too descriptive of geographic locations.
This means she’ll need to go back to the drawing board for a brand name that isn’t tied to a place.
The trademark office didn’t stop there.
They further required Meghan to amend her mark description.
Apparently, her logo, which she reportedly designed herself, didn’t quite cut it.
The officials pointed out that the current description was inconsistent with the actual logo.
The letter notes that the letter “O” in “Orchard” is not clearly visible, making the whole thing look unprofessional.
Ouch!
It seems her artistic flair may have backfired in this instance.
Next up, the identification of goods came under scrutiny.
The trademark office deemed her descriptions too broad.
Items like cocktail napkins, various cooking utensils, and even yoga blankets were flagged as overly vague.
The officials demanded more specificity, indicating that whoever filled out the application might not have done their homework.
It raises the question: did Meghan really handle this application herself?
Then, there’s the issue of multiple class application requirements.
The trademark office pointed out that her application listed goods across several international classes but failed to follow the correct order or pay necessary fees.
The whole situation sounds like a chaotic mix-up that could have been easily avoided with a bit of organization.
And if that wasn’t enough, the final blow came when it was revealed that Meghan’s application was unsigned.
Yes, you heard that right—she didn’t sign it!
This oversight rendered the application improperly verified.
The trademark office made it clear that without a signature, the application was essentially worthless.
As Steph humorously points out, this entire situation is a comedy of errors.
Meghan Markle, who has made headlines for her royal connections, now finds herself tangled in legal jargon that sounds almost absurd.
It’s hard not to chuckle at how things have unfolded.
The rejection letter has sparked conversations and debates among fans and critics alike.
Some are finding the humor in the bureaucratic mess, while others are questioning how someone with such a high profile could overlook such basic requirements.
It’s a reminder that even those in the spotlight aren’t immune to blunders.
Looking ahead, Steph has plans to bring in legal expert John Witherspoon for a deeper analysis of this trademark fiasco.
His reaction promises to be equally entertaining, as he navigates the legal maze surrounding Meghan’s application.
It’s bound to be a must-watch segment for anyone interested in the intersection of celebrity and law.
For now, the ball is in Meghan’s court.
She’ll need to rethink her branding strategy and possibly seek some legal guidance to avoid future pitfalls.
The world will be watching as she attempts to salvage her trademark aspirations.
This saga serves as a lighthearted reminder that the world of trademarks is often riddled with complexities.
And in Meghan Markle’s case, it appears that even royals must play by the rules—or face the consequences of a rejected application.
Related Stories
