Reports are surfacing that staff members at Archwell, the charitable organization founded by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, are leaving in droves due to what some describe as Meghan’s intolerable behavior.
This news comes amidst their recent visit to Colombia, where critics suggest they may be used as political pawns to deflect attention from ongoing government scandals.
The situation is raising eyebrows and prompting discussions about the couple’s motives and actions.
Andy Signor, a commentator known for his takes on celebrity news, recently highlighted the unsettling trend of high turnover within the couple’s team.
Just last week, Josh Kettler, the Chief of Staff, resigned from his position, marking the ninth departure since their move to the U.S.
This brings the total number of staff who have left Archwell to 18.
Such a churn rate is unusual for an organization that prides itself on being family-friendly and charitable.
So, what’s causing this mass exodus?
According to sources close to the couple, Meghan’s management style is a significant factor.
Reports indicate she has a reputation for being condescending and dismissive.
A photographer who worked on the couple’s wedding recounted a particularly harsh encounter, where Meghan rejected their creative efforts in a way that left the photographer in tears.
This incident is just one of many that illustrate the alleged toxic environment surrounding Markle.
Even florists have shared their negative experiences, claiming they were bullied after attempting to fulfill a request from Meghan.
Despite the allure of working with someone of her stature, many are now vowing never to collaborate with her again.
Observers note that true aristocrats typically treat their staff with respect and kindness, a stark contrast to the behavior described by those who have worked closely with Meghan.
The current trip to Colombia seems to exacerbate the situation.
Critics are questioning the wisdom of choosing a country currently grappling with drug violence and kidnapping threats for a quasi-royal tour.
The couple previously expressed concerns about safety in the U.K., yet now they appear unfazed by the risks associated with their Colombian visit.
Their itinerary includes participating in forums on cyberbullying and interacting with students in Bogota.
However, experts in national security view the trip as reckless, citing travel warnings from the U.S. State Department regarding crime and terrorism in Colombia.
The juxtaposition of their previous travels to similarly risky locations raises eyebrows about their judgment and priorities.
Travel insiders have also weighed in, suggesting that this trip resembles more of a promotional event than a genuine charitable endeavor.
They argue that it feels more like a free press opportunity rather than a serious commitment to social change.
Critics are concerned that the couple’s activities may come off as exploitative, especially as they engage with underprivileged communities while drawing attention to their own brand.
Adding fuel to the fire, Meghan reportedly spent a staggering £72,000 on wardrobe changes for this trip, which many see as tone-deaf given the economic struggles faced by many Colombians.
The optics of flaunting such wealth in a country dealing with poverty and violence have not gone unnoticed, leading to accusations of insensitivity.
The couple’s presence in Colombia has sparked outrage among locals who feel they are being used as mere props in a broader public relations strategy.
With the average monthly salary in Colombia hovering around $350, the idea of teaching online safety courses seems absurd to many, raising questions about the effectiveness and sincerity of their initiatives.
As the couple continues their tour, their actions are under scrutiny.
Critics argue that their approach may do more harm than good, suggesting that their visits could be perceived as superficial gestures rather than meaningful contributions.
The disconnect between their lifestyle and the realities faced by those they aim to help is becoming increasingly evident.
In light of these developments, it’s clear that Meghan Markle’s leadership style and the couple’s motivations are being questioned more than ever.
The outcry from both former staff and the Colombian public suggests a growing discontent with how they conduct their charitable work.
As they navigate this complex landscape, it remains to be seen whether they will adjust their approach or continue down the same path.
Related Stories
