Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has found herself at the center of a heated debate within the royal family as she was criticized for her perceived naivety in expecting to have free rein to choose her royal duties.
Before officially joining the royal family in 2018, Meghan was vocal about her support for female empowerment and education.
However, royal insiders have pointed out that members of the firm are traditionally cautious about engaging in political issues through their charity work.
Royal expert Amanda Plattel raised eyebrows by labeling Meghan as naive for anticipating that she could freely express her opinions and potentially challenge long-standing royal protocols.
Speaking on BBC’s The Princes and the Press, Plattel highlighted Meghan’s expectations of autonomy in managing her royal career, which clashed with the traditional constraints placed on royal family members.
BBC host Amol Rajan weighed in on the controversy, describing Meghan as a refreshing addition to the royal family but cautioning against an overly assertive approach that could be perceived as virtue-signaling.
Plattel echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the clash between Meghan’s outspoken nature and the reserved demeanor expected from royals.
Relationship expert Neil Wilkie added fuel to the fire by suggesting that Meghan’s outspokenness had led to her alienation from the royal family and courtiers.
Wilkie implied that Meghan’s unconventional approach clashed with the established norms of the royal household, resulting in her being sidelined by key figures within the institution.
Following her decision to step back from her official royal duties, Meghan has reclaimed her voice and actively advocated for causes close to her heart.
In a bold move, she reached out to US Senators to garner support for equal paid parental leave across the United States.
Defending her actions, Meghan emphasized that her advocacy was driven by humanitarian concerns rather than political motives.
Amidst the controversy, Prince Charles’s spokesperson dismissed claims of discussions regarding the potential skin tone of Prince Harry and Meghan’s future children.
Reports suggested that Charles had innocently pondered about the complexion of the couple’s offspring during a private conversation with his wife, Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall.
However, these innocent musings were allegedly twisted into a toxic narrative by royal advisers, causing further strain within the family.
As the debate surrounding Meghan’s role in the royal family continues to unfold, her assertiveness and advocacy for social causes have brought both admiration and criticism.
While some applaud her for breaking away from traditional royal constraints, others caution against overstepping boundaries and risking the harmony within the institution.
Meghan’s journey from a Hollywood actress to a member of the British royal family remains a subject of fascination and controversy, highlighting the complexities of balancing personal values with royal responsibilities.
Related Stories
