Bottega’s CEO has leveled serious allegations against Meghan Markle, claiming that her promotion of knock-off earrings has resulted in significant financial losses for the company.
The controversy arose following Meghan’s appearance at the 2023 Invictus Games in Düsseldorf, where she sported a chic ensemble that included a Zara-belted short jumpsuit and a cream blazer layered with an Aira top.
Completing her look with black-laced leather mules from St. Laurent, Meghan accessorized with Bottega Veneta chain hoop earrings and a Leo Zodiac diamond pendant from Brilliant Earth.
Her husband, Prince Harry, accompanied her in a semi-formal outfit.
The aftermath of Meghan’s fashion choices at the event was not as positive as expected, with the brands she showcased failing to garner substantial sales or favorable feedback from consumers.
Retailers were caught off guard by the negative impact she had on their products, leading to a series of revelations about fraudulent activities linked to these brands.
Of particular controversy were the Bottega Veneta earrings worn by Meghan, which were prominently featured on Meghan’s Mirror, a website that raised suspicions due to its sale of counterfeit goods resembling authentic items.
Concerns were raised about the authenticity of the website and potential ties to Meghan, suggesting a possible personal gain from these fraudulent operations.
Meghan’s fashion display at the Invictus Games combined a mix of high-street and high-end looks, totaling nearly £300,000 in clothing and jewelry expenses.
She showcased pieces from both affordable retailers like Zara, Banana Republic, and J.Crew, as well as mid-range designers such as Ralph Lauren and Totem.
However, the bulk of the expenses were attributed to her jewelry collection, including notable pieces like Princess Diana‘s Cartier watch and a Lorraine Schwartz pinkie ring adorned with diamonds.
Critics have pointed out that Meghan’s presence at the event shifted the focus away from the athletes and onto herself, raising questions about her involvement with potentially fraudulent websites.
Speculations regarding her motives and influence on brands have also surfaced, prompting discussions about her true intentions.
Royal commentator Danielle Elsa expressed strong opinions about Meghan’s alleged pursuit of wealth, accusing her of leveraging her connection to Prince Harry and the royal family to secure financial gains.
Elsa highlighted Meghan’s purported priorities, suggesting that she may be using her royal ties to advance her own interests and secure lucrative opportunities.
The commentator referenced Queen Elizabeth‘s previous decision to deny Meghan and Harry the use of the Sussex royal branding, hinting at a pattern of behavior that prioritizes personal gain over other considerations.
Elsa posed questions about Meghan’s future endeavors and whether she will choose to pursue an independent career or capitalize on her royal connections to ensure success in her ventures.