As 2025 approaches, the British media continues to fixate on Meghan Markle‘s wardrobe choices, nearly five years after she and Prince Harry stepped back from royal duties.
It’s remarkable, really, how much energy is spent on scrutinizing her fashion while seemingly ignoring the same level of attention towards Kate Middleton.
Despite the fact that Meghan funds her own lifestyle, the media’s disdain for her remains palpable.
The double standards are glaring.
While Meghan pays for her clothes out of her own pocket, Kate Middleton, who enjoys taxpayer funding for her wardrobe, receives little criticism.
This contradiction raises eyebrows.
For instance, headlines contrasting their spending reveal a stark difference in tone.
Meghan’s wardrobe for 2024 was reported to be worth over £100,000, while Kate’s was valued at £162,000, with no mention of the source of funding.
The media’s portrayal of Meghan often feels like an attack rather than objective reporting.
Meghan, a millionaire in her own right, is criticized for spending her money, while Kate is lauded despite using public funds.
The narrative seems skewed, suggesting a deeper bias against the Duchess of Sussex.
The media’s obsession reached new heights when one outlet detailed Meghan’s 56 public appearances in a year, breaking down her outfits and expenses as if they were tracking a criminal.
This relentless scrutiny borders on the absurd.
Meghan’s style choices have become fodder for tabloids, with one report claiming her clothing and jewelry costs totaled nearly £103,000 in 2024—a significant increase from previous years.
The Daily Mail’s meticulous accounting of her wardrobe raises questions about their priorities.
Are they equally invested in tracking Kate’s expenditures?
It seems not.
The most puzzling aspect is the media’s insistence on questioning who pays for Meghan’s clothes.
While it was previously suggested that King Charles covered some costs during her time as a working royal, this narrative has been challenged.
In reality, Meghan’s finances are her own business.
If she receives discounts or gifts from designers, that’s part of her entrepreneurial success—something the media should celebrate rather than criticize.
Comments from the public reflect frustration with this obsession.
One observer pointed out that if any other woman spent a significant amount on clothing, it wouldn’t make headlines.
But because it’s Meghan, it becomes sensational news.
This disparity highlights the media’s fixation on her, fueled by past controversies and the ongoing fallout from her departure from royal life.
Many believe that the media’s goal was to diminish Harry and Meghan’s success, hoping to force them back to the UK in a state of financial despair.
Yet, seeing them thrive despite the negativity seems to infuriate certain factions of the press.
The narrative that they would struggle without royal support has proven false, and that’s likely a sore spot for those who have relentlessly pursued them.
It’s disheartening to witness such targeted animosity.
Meghan continues to shine, and her ability to maintain her lifestyle independently should be a point of pride.
Instead, it’s twisted into a scandal.
As she heads into the new year, one can only anticipate how her fashion choices will be dissected next.
Ultimately, the media’s behavior raises important questions about fairness and accountability.
Why the relentless focus on Meghan?
Why not extend the same scrutiny to all members of the royal family?
As we move forward, it’s crucial to recognize these biases and challenge the narratives that perpetuate them.
For Meghan, the future looks bright.
With her growing influence and continued success, she’ll likely keep turning heads and making headlines.
And while the media may continue its obsessive coverage, it’s clear that Meghan is more than capable of thriving amidst the chaos.
Let’s see what 2025 has in store for her.
Related Stories
