In a twist that has captured public attention, new details surrounding the birth of Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor have surfaced, igniting speculation about Meghan Markle‘s motivations.
The baby girl was born on June 4, coinciding with the 25th anniversary of Princess Diana‘s visit to Northwestern University, a date that holds special significance for the royal family and Meghan herself.
The Chicago Tribune recently highlighted this intriguing connection, noting that Lilibet’s birth occurred on a date steeped in history related to her late grandmother, Diana.
This revelation has led many to wonder if there was more behind the timing of Lilibet’s arrival than mere coincidence.
Meghan has long been known for her admiration of Diana, raising questions about whether this alignment was intentional.
It’s worth noting that Meghan’s ties to Northwestern University run deep.
Three years after Diana’s visit, Meghan enrolled at the prestigious institution, further intertwining her life story with that of her mother-in-law.
The question remains: did Meghan plan Lilibet’s birth to coincide with this significant date?
Or is it simply a remarkable coincidence?
Adding to the drama, Meghan has reportedly expressed frustration over her children’s absence from key royal events, particularly the upcoming coronation of King Charles.
Sources suggest she feels snubbed, especially since other royal grandchildren, like those of Prince William and Kate Middleton, are set to play prominent roles during the ceremony.
This perceived slight has only intensified Meghan’s feelings, particularly as Archie‘s fourth birthday falls on the same day as the coronation.
The Sussexes had hoped for a celebration that would honor both occasions, but instead, it seems their children are being overlooked.
However, a palace insider has dismissed these concerns, asserting that the royal family is not intentionally disrespecting Archie.
The insider pointed out that Charles himself was just four years old during his mother’s coronation and found the experience tedious.
They argue that both Archie and Lilibet are too young to engage meaningfully in such formalities.
Royal commentator Daniela has weighed in on the situation, suggesting that Harry and Meghan have exhausted their options for influencing the royal narrative.
In her column for News.com Australia, she noted that King Charles has not yielded to any demands or grievances from the couple, maintaining a firm stance throughout the ongoing tensions.
Despite the Sussexes’ attempts to draw attention to their plight, it appears that public interest may be waning.
Elsa, another royal expert, believes that any future interviews by Harry and Meghan will likely result in a lackluster response from the audience.
She likened their situation to “the boy who cried wolf,” suggesting that repeated claims have dulled public outrage and sympathy.
As the royal family continues to navigate these complex dynamics, the spotlight remains on Meghan and Harry.
Their every move is scrutinized, and the world watches closely to see how they will respond to the perceived slights from the palace.
With each passing day, the intrigue surrounding Lilibet’s birth and the Sussexes’ relationship with the royal family only deepens.
Whether these connections are merely coincidental or part of a larger narrative crafted by Meghan remains to be seen.
The unfolding saga promises to keep royal watchers engaged as they speculate on the implications of these familial ties.
Related Stories
