Controversial broadcaster Piers Morgan has once again stirred up controversy by criticizing Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing them of exploiting their royal titles to take advantage of the royal family and suggesting that they should be stripped of their titles.
The ongoing saga took a new turn when it was revealed that Harry had filed a judicial review in September last year after his request for self-financed police protection was denied by the UK government on two occasions.
Morgan did not hold back in his criticism of the royal couple, alleging that they strategically chose a sensitive time to resurface while the Queen is grappling with Prince Andrew‘s legal issues and mourning the loss of her husband, Prince Philip.
He adamantly expressed his belief that Prince Harry should not be entitled to protection from the British police force and advocated for the removal of their royal titles altogether.
In his first appearance on UK Breakfast TV post his departure from Good Morning Britain, Piers Morgan engaged in a conversation with Sophie Raworth, where he condemned the timing of Harry and Meghan’s actions, especially considering the Queen’s current challenges.
He empathized with the Queen’s plight, particularly as she approaches her platinum jubilee amidst personal and family turmoil.
Expressing his frustration, Morgan emphasized that Prince Harry’s request for British police protection upon his return to the UK was unwarranted, given his status as a private citizen who no longer fulfills royal duties.
Despite claims that Harry intended to cover the security costs personally, Morgan dismissed this notion, contending that the couple has profited immensely from their royal titles while disparaging the monarchy.
The legal battle over security measures intensified as details emerged about Harry’s efforts to secure police protection for himself and his family during their UK visits.
Following their split from the royal family, the couple lost their publicly funded police security in the UK and have since relied on private security in the US.
However, Harry’s legal team highlighted the inadequacy of private security and emphasized the necessity of police protection for their safety.
A spokesperson for Prince Harry underscored his commitment to covering the expenses of security arrangements without burdening British taxpayers, citing instances where his security was compromised due to the absence of police protection.
The statement revealed Harry’s persistent attempts to ensure the safety of his family in the UK, emphasizing his attachment to the country as his home and his desire for a secure environment for his wife and children.
With the judicial review process unfolding and Harry’s plea for reassessment of security measures gaining attention, the complexity of the situation continues to escalate.
The juxtaposition of personal safety concerns, financial responsibilities, and royal privileges underscores the intricate web of challenges faced by Prince Harry and Meghan as they navigate their post-royal life while seeking to balance security needs with public expectations.
As the debate surrounding the royal couple’s entitlements and responsibilities intensifies, the underlying tension between personal choices and public obligations remains unresolved.
The intersection of privilege, duty, and autonomy in the context of the monarchy raises profound questions about the evolving dynamics within the royal family and the broader implications of individual decisions on institutional integrity and public perception.
Related Stories
