Prince Harry and Meghan Markle found themselves under fire after denouncing social media, a move that sparked criticism from royal commentators.
The couple, who previously embraced online platforms, announced their decision to step back from social media earlier this year, citing relentless online abuse as the primary reason for their withdrawal.
Despite their absence from major social networks and Prince Harry‘s vow to refrain from returning until misinformation issues are addressed, some observers expressed confusion over the sudden change in stance.
During a recent interview at the Rewired Summit, Prince Harry highlighted the detrimental impact of misinformation on social media, emphasizing the need for urgent action to combat the spread of false information.
Referencing the tragic loss of his mother, Princess Diana, to media scrutiny, the Duke underscored his determination to shield his own family from similar harm.
However, critics like Richard Eden, the Daily Mail’s editor, questioned the couple’s shift in attitude towards social media, noting their previous active engagement with online platforms.
Richard Eden speculated that Harry and Meghan’s disillusionment with social media may stem from their inability to monetize their presence, unlike other lucrative partnerships with streaming services such as Spotify and Netflix.
Dr. Tessa Dunlop, a royal historian, rebuked Eden’s skepticism and pivoted to Prince Harry’s claim of forewarning Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey about the Capitol Hill riots in January.
Despite the Duke’s proactive stance on addressing online threats, doubts lingered over how he acquired such intel while supposedly abstaining from social media.
Earlier this year, reports surfaced that Prince Harry and Meghan had decided to distance themselves from personal social media use and opted to maintain a low profile for their Archewell Foundation on prominent platforms.
The couple faced further scrutiny for allegedly attempting to overshadow Remembrance Day with self-centered actions, prompting entertainment commentator Mr. Myers to question their motives.
Criticism mounted over the couple’s choice of photographs, with suggestions that a more subdued approach would have been more appropriate given the solemn nature of the occasion.
As the debate surrounding Harry and Meghan’s relationship with social media continues to unfold, their evolving stance on online engagement raises questions about authenticity and motives.
While the couple’s efforts to address online abuse and misinformation are commendable, discrepancies in their public statements and actions invite scrutiny from both supporters and skeptics.
The intersection of royalty, social media, and personal branding remains a complex terrain for the Sussexes to navigate, as they seek to balance advocacy with privacy in an increasingly interconnected digital landscape.
