Royal commentators have turned their attention to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s residence at Frogmore Cottage in Windsor, following the airing of the second part of the BBC’s controversial documentary, The Princes and the Press.
Originally transformed into a family home for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex before their exit as senior working royals, the cottage is now occupied by Prince Harry’s cousin, Princess Eugenie, and her husband, Jack Brooksbank.
The initial segment of the documentary, broadcast on Monday, November 22, faced significant backlash.
The subsequent episode, which aired on Monday, November 29, has also stirred controversy.
In anticipation of the second part, royal expert Richard Eden expressed skepticism on Twitter about the documentary’s balance.
Subsequently, the Daily Mail’s diary editor highlighted what he perceived as a significant flaw in the BBC’s coverage, noting the absence of key information regarding Harry and Meghan’s decision to forego another residence at Mat Ken Palace.
Reactions to the documentary varied among viewers.
Some, like Jen Carson-Taylor, noted a different tone but questioned the motives behind the BBC’s narrative shaping.
Speculations arose about potential biases and attempts to influence public opinion.
These discussions prompted further engagement on social media platforms, with contrasting viewpoints and interpretations.
Critics of the documentary, including followers of a fan page dedicated to Prince William and Kate, suggested that Harry and Meghan’s choice of residence was influenced by personal dynamics within the royal family.
However, dissenting voices pointed out inconsistencies in the arguments presented and raised questions about the accuracy of the information being circulated.
The two-part documentary, The Princes and the Press, explores the complex relationships between Prince Harry, Prince William, and the media in the UK.
Hosted by Amol Rajan, the BBC production features insights from various journalists in both broadcast and print media.
The first installment drew collective criticism from multiple royal households, prompting a rare joint statement emphasizing the importance of responsible journalism and factual reporting.
In response to the concerns raised by the royal households, BBC Chair Richard Sharpe defended the documentary, highlighting the institution’s commitment to upholding journalistic integrity and respecting its relationship with the royal family.
The second part of the documentary delves deeper into Harry and Meghan’s decision to step back from active royal duties, shedding light on the controversies surrounding the renovations at Frogmore Cottage.
The renovations at Frogmore Cottage, amounting to £2.4 million, became a focal point of discussion, particularly after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex reimbursed the Sovereign Grant Fund from their private funds following their departure from official royal roles.
A spokesperson for the couple clarified that the contribution fully covered the renovation costs and solidified Frogmore Cottage as their UK residence.
Following the broadcast of the contentious documentary, The Princes and the Press, scrutiny has intensified on Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s living arrangements at Frogmore Cottage.
The evolution of the cottage from a royal abode to a private home for the Sussexes reflects the ongoing complexities within the royal family.
Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank now call Frogmore Cottage their home, marking a new chapter in the legacy of this historic residence.
