In recent weeks, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been making headlines for all the right reasons.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are actively engaged in various charitable endeavors, embodying the change they wish to see in the world.
Their commitment to philanthropy is a refreshing reminder of what true royalty should represent—service to others.
As they travel across the United States and beyond, their efforts haven’t gone unnoticed, especially by the UK media, which seems to be keeping a keen eye on their every move.
Interestingly, it appears that the British press is grappling with a mix of admiration and frustration.
The Sussexes are achieving remarkable things as private citizens, something that seems to irk the UK media, who no longer have the same level of access to them as they do with other royal family members.
This shift has left some commentators feeling a sense of loss, as they realize that Harry and Meghan have truly moved on from the royal spotlight.
On a recent episode of Jeremy Vine’s show, the discussion took a surprising turn.
The panel posed a question to viewers: Would they like to see Prince Harry return to the UK?
This was quite a leap from earlier narratives that suggested Harry would eventually return to the UK alone, perhaps regretting his decision to leave.
Now, the conversation has shifted to a place of longing, highlighting the positive impact Harry is making abroad.
One caller expressed a sentiment that many might share: a deep sense of affection for Harry and a desire for his return.
They reminisced about his charisma and connection to his late mother, Princess Diana.
Despite acknowledging Harry’s mistakes, the caller emphasized that everyone makes them.
They pointed out the challenges he faces outside the confines of both the Army and the royal family, suggesting that his departure has left a void in the hearts of many.
However, another voice in the discussion raised concerns about whether Harry himself wishes to return.
The idea that he might be lured back by trivial interests like football or sweets seemed far-fetched.
It’s worth noting that former head of counter-terrorism Neil Basu has repeatedly highlighted the serious threats Harry and Meghan faced while living in the UK, including numerous investigations into death threats against them.
The conversation took a more serious turn when discussing the media’s treatment of Meghan.
Many have forgotten the relentless scrutiny she faced, even during her pregnancy with Archie.
The negative coverage didn’t cease after their departure; rather, it intensified, revealing a troubling pattern of abuse that began long before they left the royal family.
It begs the question: how can the media justify their treatment of Harry and Meghan while simultaneously expressing a desire for his return?
Tessa Dunlop, a frequent commentator on royal matters, often shifts her perspective regarding Harry and Meghan.
However, during this segment, she candidly admitted that the negative articles stem from a sense of loss—bitterness over Harry’s departure and his choice to marry a biracial woman.
This admission is telling; it highlights the underlying issues of racism and prejudice that have marred their experiences.
The narrative that Harry left the UK out of a desire to escape punishment is misguided.
Instead, it seems that his departure was a necessary step to protect his family from the toxic environment created by the media and public scrutiny.
The attacks on Meghan and their children were not a result of their leaving; they were ongoing issues that necessitated their exit.
Gertrude, another caller, further emphasized the level of harassment Harry and Meghan endured while still in the UK.
She pointed out that the royal family never publicly addressed the abuse they faced, allowing the media to continue its relentless campaign against them.
This silence speaks volumes about the family’s priorities, particularly regarding Meghan and their children.
Harry’s actions reflect those of any protective husband and father.
After witnessing the treatment of his wife and children, he made a choice to prioritize their safety and well-being.
His reluctance to spend extended periods in the UK is a testament to the challenges they faced there.
He’s not just protecting his family; he’s also asserting their right to live free from constant scrutiny and harassment.
As discussions continue about Harry’s potential return, it’s clear that the UK media’s longing for him is rooted in their realization of what they’ve lost.
His philanthropic work and global appeal stand in stark contrast to the perceived apathy of other royal family members.
While the media may wish for Harry’s comeback, it seems that he has firmly established a new life where he and Meghan can thrive.
The narrative surrounding the Sussexes remains complex.
The media’s persistent negative coverage is not merely a reflection of their choices but also an indication of deeper societal issues.
As Harry and Meghan continue to carve their own path, it becomes increasingly evident that their journey is one of resilience against adversity.
The UK media may miss Harry, but it’s unlikely he’ll be returning anytime soon.
