In a significant shake-up for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Ashley Hansen has announced her departure from Archwell, where she served as their Global Press Secretary and Head of Communications.
Hansen is set to launch her own public relations firm, Three Gate Strategies, while claiming she will continue to advise the couple.
However, her exit raises pressing questions about the future stability of the Sussex brand and whether the couple is facing a deeper crisis.
Hansen’s departure is particularly noteworthy as it marks the 19th staff member to leave the Sussexes in recent years.
This statistic reflects a troubling trend within their organization, suggesting that the work environment may not be as harmonious as portrayed.
Having been with the couple for over two years, Hansen was one of the last remaining loyalists in a team that has seen a rapid turnover.
The timing of her announcement is curious.
Just days before launching her new venture, Hansen publicly defended Meghan against the “Duchess Difficult” label—a nickname that has shadowed the couple since their move to the U.S.
Many speculate that this defense was an attempt to project unity before her sudden exit, leading to questions about the authenticity of their public image.
The Sussexes have been under intense scrutiny, particularly regarding their management style and treatment of staff.
Reports suggest that Meghan has developed a reputation for belittling employees and ignoring advice, contributing to a toxic workplace atmosphere.
A recent exposé in the Hollywood Reporter even likened Meghan to a “dictator in high heels,” further fueling these allegations.
If the work environment was as supportive as Hansen stated, why would she choose to leave?
This question looms large, especially given the pattern of high staff turnover that has plagued the couple.
The constant departure of individuals, from production managers to chiefs of staff, raises serious concerns about Harry and Meghan’s leadership abilities.
Take Josh Kettler, for example.
He lasted just three months as chief of staff before opting to leave due to discomfort with his role.
Such experiences highlight a troubling reality: if numerous talented professionals struggle to thrive under the Sussexes’ management, it casts doubt on the couple’s effectiveness as employers.
While Hansen has publicly praised the couple for their support during her recovery from surgery, her departure calls into question the sincerity of those sentiments.
She described their care as parental, but such statements could easily mask underlying issues within the organization.
Now, as Hansen embarks on her new journey with Three Gate Strategies, which aims to serve clients across entertainment, tech, and finance, the implications are significant.
This pivot suggests that she may have recognized more promising opportunities beyond the Sussex brand, further indicating a potential decline in its allure.
Moreover, the fact that Hansen is launching her own firm while still advising the Sussexes raises eyebrows.
Is this a strategic move to leverage her connections with them, or does it signal a distancing from the couple?
Either way, it illustrates her desire for a more stable and lucrative career path.
The ongoing exodus of staff from the Sussexes’ inner circle paints a concerning picture.
As more individuals leave, the couple must confront the reality of their leadership style and the impact it has on their long-term goals.
If they cannot foster a supportive environment, their future endeavors may be at risk.
