Royal expert Tom Bower recently shared his perspective on why the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, will not be present at the upcoming crowning of King Charles III on May 6th.
During an appearance on GB News, Bower speculated that this decision could be linked to her sister-in-law, Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge.
In a conversation with Nigel Farage, Bower expressed his view on Prince Harry‘s solo attendance at the ceremony, labeling it as an “ugly compromise.”
He suggested that Kate possibly played a pivotal role in ensuring Meghan’s exclusion, stating that she would have adamantly opposed Meghan’s presence under any circumstances.
Bower further hypothesized that if Meghan had attended, she might have been relegated to a less prominent position, such as sitting at the back.
Bower emphasized the constitutional significance of Harry’s presence at the event, highlighting the potential succession implications.
He underscored the importance of Harry’s role within the Royal Family, especially considering the hypothetical scenario where he could ascend the throne following Charles.
The discussion then shifted to the traditional post-crowning balcony appearance at Buckingham Palace.
Bower acknowledged that Meghan’s absence might make it easier for Harry to partake in this customary ritual.
However, he cautioned against such a move, fearing that allowing Harry to appear without Meghan could set a controversial precedent, particularly when juxtaposed with Prince Andrew‘s potential inclusion.
In closing, Bower underscored the centrality of King Charles III in the coronation proceedings, emphasizing the scrutiny surrounding his future reign.
The focus, according to Bower, should center on Charles’ acceptance, popularity, and ability to embody a new era under his kingship.
Meanwhile, the announcement from Buckingham Palace confirmed Meghan’s absence from the historic event, as she remains in California with her children, Archie and Lindybutt.
The decision to forego attending the coronation underscores the ongoing dynamics within the Royal Family and raises questions about Harry’s role in the ceremonial events.
As discussions around royal protocols and family dynamics continue to unfold, the absence of Meghan Markle at King Charles III’s coronation has sparked speculation and debate among royal enthusiasts.
The nuanced interplay between tradition, familial relationships, and public perception adds layers of complexity to this unfolding narrative.
What are your thoughts on this intriguing development?
Share your opinions in the comments below, and stay tuned for more updates on Royal News and Analysis in our next installment.
Related Stories
