Ryan Mark, known for his straightforward opinions, didn’t hold back when discussing Harry and Meghan’s latest actions.
He expressed his disapproval after the couple received an olive branch from the Queen.
Mark’s disdain for the duo was evident as he compared them to wasps – pointless, irritating, and capable of delivering a nasty sting.
Mark highlighted Meghan’s sharp words at the Invictus Games, where she subtly criticized the royal family’s dedication to service.
He also pointed out Harry’s reluctance to discuss his father and brother during a recent interview with NBC.
The columnist has been vocal about his negative views towards the couple since their decision to step back from royal duties.
Despite claiming to pursue privacy, Harry and Meghan continue to be in the spotlight for various projects, including interviews, podcasts, and TV appearances.
Mark criticized their endeavors, labeling them as self-serving and lacking genuine commitment to noble causes.
He emphasized that their actions seem driven by a desire for fame and fortune.
The columnist expressed concern over the Queen’s forgiving nature towards Harry and Meghan.
He questioned the couple’s priorities, contrasting their activities with the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s dedication to royal responsibilities.
Mark suggested that the Queen’s leniency towards the pair may not be in the best interest of the monarchy.
Mark called for Harry and Meghan to be banned from public appearances with the royal family, emphasizing the need for consequences for their actions.
He criticized the couple for prioritizing personal pursuits over their duties to the crown.
The columnist highlighted the potential backlash from the public if Harry and Meghan were to appear alongside the royal family again.
During a recent interview, Harry avoided questions about his relationship with his father and brother, focusing instead on his commitment to veterans and families.
Mark speculated that the narrative being promoted by Netflix and the couple’s publicists may be exaggerating Harry’s connection with the Queen for dramatic effect.
The columnist expressed disbelief at the Queen’s efforts to mend ties with Harry and Meghan, considering their past actions and ambitions.
He questioned whether the couple truly deserved the Queen’s forgiveness, especially given their pursuit of Hollywood fame.
Mark suggested that a more severe response, such as a public ban, would be more appropriate.
Mark highlighted the contrast between Harry and Meghan’s behavior and the dedication shown by other members of the royal family, particularly during significant events.
He criticized the couple for their perceived lack of respect towards the Queen and their failure to prioritize royal duties over personal interests.
In conclusion, Mark’s critique of Harry and Meghan’s actions reflects a growing sentiment of disappointment and disapproval towards the couple’s choices.
He emphasized the need for accountability and consequences for those who prioritize personal gain over royal responsibilities.
The columnist’s commentary serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges faced by the modern monarchy in navigating public expectations and personal ambitions.
