Piers Morgan has broken his silence after Prince Harry called for a police investigation.
The talk TV host and former newspaper editor did not hold back in responding to the Duke of Sussex.
Welcome to Royal Pancakes.
Make sure you subscribe and click the notifications bell to stay updated on all things British Royal Family.
Criticism from Piers Morgan towards Prince Harry ensued after the Duke of Sussex’s lawyer issued a statement on his behalf following a settlement with Mirror Group newspapers, where the talk TV host was directly mentioned.
The 39-year-old is set to receive additional damages from MGN along with his legal fees, as confirmed by his lawyer David Sherborne.
Prince Harry condemned the former Mirror newspaper editor in a statement read by Mr. Sherborne, citing Morgan’s relentless attacks against him.
The statement emphasized the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability for all, including individuals like Morgan, who, as an editor, was well aware of the situation, according to the judge.
Even Morgan’s employer acknowledged that he could not be called as a factual witness in court due to his conduct.
His defiance of the court’s decision and ongoing criticisms further underscore the necessity of a clear and definitive ruling.
In response, the 58-year-old took to X, where he boasts 8.7 million followers, stating his agreement with Prince Harry on the unacceptable intrusion into the Royal Family’s private affairs for financial gain.
He expressed hope that such behavior would cease.
Harry’s legal action against MGN alleged various unethical practices, including voicemail interception and deception to obtain information, prompting the settlement announcement by Mr. Sherborne.
The settlement involves an interim payment of £400,000 from the publisher to the Duke.
This is not the first instance of Morgan attacking the Prince post-court proceedings.
In a previous ruling by Judge Fancourt, it was revealed that voicemail interception was prevalent at MGN titles in the late 1990s, resulting in damages awarded to Harry.
Following this ruling, Morgan criticized the Duke for allegedly profiting off his family’s turmoil while claiming to advocate for media reform, suggesting his true intentions were to dismantle the British monarchy.
The ongoing saga between Piers Morgan and Prince Harry continues to unfold, shedding light on the complexities surrounding privacy, media ethics, and the responsibilities of public figures.
As the narrative evolves, both parties remain steadfast in their positions, each seeking validation and justice in their respective claims.
The repercussions of this high-profile dispute reverberate across the media landscape, prompting discussions on accountability, integrity, and the boundaries of journalistic practices.
Time will tell how this clash of personalities and principles will ultimately shape the future of media discourse and public perception.
Related Stories
