Recent observations by royal biographer Hugo Vickers suggest striking parallels between Prince Harry and Edward VIII, both of whom faced profound sadness after stepping away from their royal duties.
Vickers, who has penned works on notable royals including the Duke of Kent and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, draws intriguing comparisons between the two figures.
In 2020, Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, made headlines when they decided to resign from their royal roles.
This drastic move was reportedly an effort to escape relentless media attention and the pressures that come with royal life.
Similarly, Edward VIII abdicated the throne in 1936, primarily to marry American divorcee Wallis Simpson—a union that was met with considerable opposition from the British government.
While Edward VIII never publicly expressed regret over his decision to leave the throne, Vickers recalls the former king’s profoundly sad demeanor.
“I have never seen anyone with such sad eyes,” he remarked during a recent speech at the Henley Literary Festival.
He contrasted this with the twinkling eyes of Queen Elizabeth II, attributing her joy to a life dedicated to duty.
Vickers believes that while Edward VIII sought happiness through marriage, true contentment often stems from fulfilling one’s responsibilities.
He mused that if he were to wake Edward VIII in the early hours and question him about regrets, the answer would likely be a firm “no.”
However, he added, the truth of his feelings could be found in the sadness reflected in his eyes.
Turning his attention to Prince Harry, Vickers noted a similar air of unhappiness surrounding the Duke of Sussex since his departure from royal life.
“He looks quite miserable,” Vickers stated, leaving many to ponder the future for Harry and Meghan.
The uncertainty that clouds their path is palpable, as they navigate life outside the royal spotlight.
Vickers also addressed King Charles III’s vision for a “diluted monarchy,” expressing concern that this approach might threaten the royal family’s relevance.
“I don’t know how you can have a diluted monarchy because people want to see them,” he articulated, highlighting the importance of maintaining a robust royal presence.
These reflections came shortly after Buckingham Palace unveiled the first official photograph of King Charles III alongside Queen Camilla.
The image featured the Prince of Wales, now visibly taller than his father, and his newly appointed wife, the Princess of Wales.
This photograph was rich in symbolism, showcasing the new king with his heir while casting a shadow of history with the image of King George III, the longest-reigning male monarch in British history, looming behind them.
Notably, the photo was taken just before the Queen’s funeral, a time when the four senior royals were preparing to host a significant reception for visiting heads of state.
Yet, the absence of Prince Harry in this family moment speaks volumes, serving as a poignant reminder of the distance that has grown between him and the rest of the royal family.
Related Stories
