In a revealing report by The Hollywood Reporter, the ongoing exodus of professionals from Harry and Meghan’s circle has come under scrutiny.
This phenomenon raises questions about the couple’s leadership style and the working environment at their organization, Archewell.
It’s not just a matter of high-profile departures; it reflects a deeper issue that many are now discussing.
The latest to join the ranks of the so-called “Sussex Survivors Club” is Josh Kettler, who recently resigned after just three months as chief of staff.
His departure is part of a troubling trend that has seen numerous experienced individuals leave their roles while working with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Before Kettler, there were other notable exits, including Toya Holness, who served as their global press secretary until 2022, and Christine Will Shermer, who held the position of PR head back in 2021.
What’s particularly striking is that these aren’t novices stepping into the spotlight; they’re seasoned professionals with impressive credentials.
Their backgrounds showcase a wealth of experience across various industries, yet they found themselves overwhelmed within the confines of Archewell.
It’s puzzling to see such skilled individuals struggling in an environment that, on paper, should have been brimming with potential.
One might wonder why these professionals are leaving despite their robust qualifications.
The lack of substantial projects at Archewell appears to be a significant factor.
Without meaningful work to engage in, it becomes increasingly challenging for anyone to feel motivated or inspired.
After all, career advancement often hinges on successful project completion and the ability to showcase accomplishments.
Samantha Cohen, Meghan’s former top aide, also departed around the same time as Kettler, adding to the growing list of resignations.
Keely Thomas Morgan, who had been representing Meghan since her days as a TV star, also stepped back from her role in 2020.
These exits paint a picture of a workplace fraught with discontent and frustration.
Sources close to the situation have hinted at a toxic atmosphere, with reports suggesting that Meghan’s temperament may have played a crucial role in the departures.
Allegations of her being demanding, coupled with claims of aggressive communication styles, have surfaced.
This paints a rather unflattering portrait of the Duchess, who has been described as “Duchess Difficult” by some former staff members.
While Harry is often seen as charming and approachable, insiders suggest that he tends to enable Meghan’s behavior rather than temper it.
This dynamic raises questions about their effectiveness as leaders and whether they can foster a healthy work environment.
Their frequent changes in direction and decision-making have reportedly left staff feeling unsettled and unappreciated.
The bullying allegations against Meghan, which emerged during her time as a royal, have resurfaced in discussions about her current leadership style.
While she has dismissed these accusations as a smear campaign, the consistent pattern of staff departures suggests that something deeper may be at play.
Reports of her “dictatorial” behavior and “tantrums” have led to a growing concern about the sustainability of the Archewell project.
As more professionals leave, the question arises: what does this mean for the couple’s future endeavors?
With a string of high-profile exits, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for Harry and Meghan to maintain a stable team.
The risk of stagnation looms large, especially if their new hires find themselves in a similar predicament.
The reality is that without a solid track record of completed projects, any future job seeker will likely view a stint at Archewell with skepticism.
What can they say they accomplished during their time there?
It’s a daunting prospect, one that could deter even the most ambitious candidates from joining.
In light of these developments, it’s clear that both Harry and Meghan face significant challenges ahead.
They must address the underlying issues within their organization if they hope to attract and retain talent moving forward.
The clock is ticking, and how they respond will ultimately shape the future of their ventures.
As this story unfolds, many are left wondering: can the couple turn things around, or will the departures continue?
The answer remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the world is watching closely.
