Recent whispers in the tabloids suggest that tension is brewing between Meghan Markle and her mother, Doria Ragland.
The root of their conflict appears to be financial strain, particularly after Meghan’s lucrative deal with Spotify fell through, leaving her without a steady income.
Doria, facing her own economic challenges, seems to be leaning heavily on Meghan and her husband, Prince Harry, for support.
This situation has reportedly pushed Meghan to her limits, sparking thoughts of asking her mother to move out.
In an attempt to address their mounting issues, Doria has taken it upon herself to clarify what she considers common decency.
It seems the relationship between mother and daughter is becoming increasingly strained, with both parties feeling the pressure of their circumstances.
The financial difficulties have undoubtedly added a layer of complexity to their interactions, making it harder for them to navigate their familial ties.
Adding fuel to the fire, Doria recently made headlines by sharing a photo that has raised eyebrows.
This image, which features the late Queen Elizabeth II, was initially presented as a cherished family moment with newborn Archie at Windsor Castle.
However, Doria has now confirmed that the Queen never actually posed with Meghan and Archie during that time, contradicting previous narratives.
The original photograph, shared by Doria, shows the Queen in a white shirt and blue cardigan, striking a familiar smile.
Yet, this image has been cleverly cropped, leading many to question its authenticity.
Observers have noted that the height differences between Doria, Meghan, and the Queen seem off, suggesting that the image may have undergone significant photoshopping.
Moreover, the circumstances surrounding Archie’s christening have come under scrutiny.
Reports indicate that the Archbishop of Canterbury, who supposedly officiated the ceremony, was attending a meeting in York on that very day.
This raises questions about the legitimacy of the event and whether it was staged for public consumption.
Further complicating matters, the presence of Prince Charles and Camilla in the christening photos has also been called into question.
They were reportedly en route to a royal engagement in Europe at the time, yet they appear in the images wearing outfits from a previous royal visit.
This has led to speculation about the authenticity of the photographs and the lengths to which the Sussexes might go to maintain their public image.
Additionally, the absence of Princess Diana‘s sisters from the christening has not gone unnoticed.
They too seem to have been digitally inserted into the images, further fueling discussions about the authenticity of these family moments.
It paints a picture of a couple desperate to create a narrative that aligns with their desired public persona.
The Sussexes’ approach to media appearances has often been described as theatrical.
Meghan’s past public outings, especially during her pregnancy, have drawn criticism for their orchestrated nature.
From her choice of attire to her body language, many have speculated that these moments are meticulously planned rather than spontaneous.
A particularly memorable instance occurred when Meghan made a grand entrance at Eugenie’s wedding in 2018.
With her coat unbuttoned, she seemed to revel in the attention, setting the stage for the months that followed.
Throughout her pregnancy, she maintained a careful narrative, often cradling her baby bump in a way that felt rehearsed.
As the months wore on, Meghan’s use of a pregnancy prop—a moon bump—became a topic of discussion.
Critics pointed out inconsistencies in how she wore it, with some days appearing too large or too small, and even causing awkward moments during public appearances.
These slip-ups only added to the perception that her public persona was more performance than reality.
The drama surrounding Meghan and Doria highlights the complexities of their relationship, exacerbated by financial woes and a desire for public approval.
As tensions rise, it remains to be seen how this family dynamic will evolve and whether they can find a resolution amidst the scrutiny of the media and public.
