In a revealing podcast episode, Charles Spencer, the younger brother of the late Princess Diana, shared personal insights about his health challenges while expressing his growing frustration with Prince Harry‘s behavior.
The discussion took place on his show, Rabbit Hole Detectives, where he was joined by Reverend Richard Coles and historian Dr. Kat Jarman.
During the episode, Spencer opened up about his struggles with debilitating migraines.
He described his experience of seeking relief through acupuncture, saying, “I see an acupuncturist when I get terrible migraines.” His candid remarks highlighted the duality of his treatment; while effective, it can also trigger a cascade of pain that leaves him in agony.
“It’s really debilitating,” he admitted, acknowledging that many endure worse suffering.
The conversation took a turn when Spencer’s friend revealed that Harry’s actions have exacerbated his health issues.
Historically, the Spencer family has been supportive of the British monarchy, particularly in their admiration for future King William.
However, Harry’s recent controversies have left Charles feeling angry and disappointed, especially after Harry’s memoir, Spare, included sensitive references to Diana that some found disrespectful.
Adding fuel to the fire, Harry’s collaboration with Netflix to recreate the tragic scene of Diana’s fatal car accident has drawn sharp criticism.
This latest move, combined with Harry’s candid discussions about drug use in his memoir, has stirred significant backlash.
Conservative think tank Heritage Foundation has called for transparency regarding Harry’s visa application, questioning whether he disclosed his past drug use.
Sources close to Harry have reportedly informed the Daily Telegraph that he was honest on his visa application.
However, the Heritage Foundation is pursuing a Freedom of Information request to clarify the details surrounding his immigration status.
This inquiry comes as Harry faces scrutiny over his past drug use, which could complicate his visa renewal process.
Samuel Dewey, a lawyer from the Heritage Foundation, articulated the uncertainty surrounding Harry’s treatment during the visa application process.
“We just don’t know how Prince Harry has been treated,” he stated, emphasizing the need for clarity on whether he received any preferential treatment.
The director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, Gardner, underscored the gravity of the drug issue.
He noted that U.S. visa applicants must disclose any drug use, and failing to do so could lead to denial of entry.
This raises questions about Harry’s immigration experience and whether he faced different standards compared to regular applicants.
As the situation unfolds, it appears that Charles Spencer is distancing himself from Harry, driven by a mix of personal health struggles and familial disappointment.
The ongoing drama surrounding Harry’s actions seems to have strained relationships within the Spencer family, once known for their unwavering support of the monarchy.
This rift highlights the complexities of family dynamics amidst public scrutiny and personal battles.
With Charles’s health issues and Harry’s controversial choices at the forefront, the Spencer family narrative continues to evolve in unexpected ways.
As the public watches this family saga unfold, the implications of their actions resonate far beyond their personal lives.
Charles Spencer’s revelations not only shed light on his health struggles but also reflect the broader tensions within the royal family, leaving many to wonder what the future holds for these once-close relatives.
