In a surprising twist in the saga of the Sussexes, recent revelations have left many scratching their heads.
It turns out that the U.S. Constitution has a firm grip on royal titles, specifically when it comes to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s children.
The couple has reportedly taken the liberty of referring to their kids as prince and princess, despite a glaring constitutional barrier that forbids such titles for American citizens.
The buzz began when the Sussexes allegedly invited King Charles and Prince William to a christening at their home.
Interestingly, Meghan’s estranged father and family were not on the guest list, nor was Tyler Perry.
Unsurprisingly, neither royal showed up.
This snub has sparked conversations about the couple’s ongoing relationship—or lack thereof—with the British royal family.
Adding fuel to the fire, Ngozi Fulani recently claimed she possesses a recording of an incident involving the royal family and is demanding a public apology.
Critics argue that by positioning their children with royal titles, the Sussexes are setting them up for potential ridicule and bullying.
After all, both kids are American citizens, and their parents seem to have ensured they won’t have a genuine connection with the working members of the monarchy.
So, who exactly is supposed to be impressed by these self-proclaimed titles?
While some Americans might find it amusing, many others likely couldn’t care less.
In reality, unless the Sussexes insist that their staff use these titles, there’s little chance anyone else will.
It seems like a desperate attempt to grab attention.
The U.S. Constitution is crystal clear on this matter.
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 expressly states that no titles of nobility shall be granted by the United States.
This reflects a deep-seated aversion to aristocracy and reinforces the republic’s principles.
The framers of the Constitution were keen to avoid any semblance of hereditary privilege, which was a common concern during the revolutionary era.
If Harry and Meghan want their children to enjoy royal titles, they might need to reconsider their citizenship status.
As U.S. citizens, they cannot claim privileges associated with nobility.
And let’s be real—demanding to be called Duchess or Prince in America is a violation of constitutional rights.
If that’s what they desire, perhaps a move back to the UK is in order.
Moreover, the couple has been quite vocal about their disdain for royal traditions, yet their actions suggest otherwise.
They named their first child after a significant figure in the royal family while simultaneously distancing themselves from the institution.
It’s a confusing narrative that raises eyebrows and questions about their true intentions.
In a rather ironic twist, the Sussexes have branded themselves as modern and enlightened, claiming they’re breaking free from the shackles of tradition.
Yet, they seem to cling to the very titles and privileges they publicly renounce.
It’s a contradiction that many find hard to digest.
Their approach to parenting appears to be a mix of rebellion and nostalgia.
They want to raise their children as free spirits while simultaneously invoking royal lineage.
This duality leaves many wondering if they truly understand the implications of their choices.
As the saga unfolds, the Sussexes continue to attract attention, but not always in the way they might hope.
By navigating this complex landscape of titles, citizenship, and royal heritage, they risk creating a target on their backs.
The stakes are high, and the public is watching closely.
