Prince Harry finds himself at the center of controversy once again as calls intensify for him to sever ties with Netflix amid criticism over the portrayal of his late mother, Princess Diana, in the hit series “The Crown.”
The latest blow comes as Jemima Khan, a close friend of Princess Diana, exits the show, citing a lack of compassion in the depiction of Diana leading up to her tragic death in 1997.
Renowned royal expert Angela Levin has lambasted Harry for his silence on the matter, demanding that he take a stand by terminating the lucrative £112 million deal with Netflix.
In a scathing remark, Levin questioned Harry’s priorities, asking whether money or defending his mother holds greater significance for the Duke.
The deafening silence from Harry’s camp has left many questioning his commitment to honoring Diana’s legacy.
Amid the growing backlash, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle face mounting criticism from both royal circles and entertainment industry insiders for maintaining their partnership with Netflix.
The couple inked the multi-million-pound deal with the streaming giant in September 2020, paving the way for various projects, including a documentary offering a glimpse into their post-royal life.
Concerns have been raised within royal circles regarding the ethical implications of profiting from Netflix, particularly as the platform continues to capitalize on Diana’s story through shows like “The Crown.”
The upcoming season of the series is set to delve into Diana’s most challenging moments, raising further questions about the appropriateness of the portrayals.
Notable figures close to Princess Diana, such as British filmmaker Jemima Khan, have expressed reservations about their involvement in projects related to Diana’s life due to concerns over the sensitive handling of her story.
Khan’s decision to distance herself from the show underscores the deep-seated unease surrounding the depiction of Diana’s narrative in popular media.
As industry insiders speculate on the nature of Harry and Meghan’s collaboration with Netflix, questions loom over the couple’s perceived silence on the matter.
With no content released thus far under the Netflix deal, skepticism abounds regarding the value of the partnership and the extent of creative input from the Sussexes.
In light of the ongoing scrutiny, Prince William‘s reaction to the portrayal of his mother has also come into focus.
A family source emphasized William’s enduring respect for Diana’s memory while condemning any exploitation or disrespect shown towards her legacy.
The source underscored the need for a balanced and respectful approach to Diana’s story, cautioning against sensationalism.
Meanwhile, Meghan Markle’s involvement in an animated series with David Furnish and Harry’s project on the Invictus Games add further layers to the couple’s burgeoning media ventures.
The revelation that they brought along personal videographers on a recent trip hints at their keen interest in shaping their public image through visual storytelling.
Despite the royal family’s collective disapproval of “The Crown,” Harry’s admission that he watched the series has sparked debate over its fictionalized portrayal of historical events.
While acknowledging the show’s creative liberties, Harry highlighted the underlying themes of duty, family, and sacrifice depicted in the series, offering a nuanced perspective on the challenges faced by royals.
As the saga unfolds, Prince Harry finds himself at a crossroads, torn between financial opportunities and familial allegiance.
The mounting pressure to address the ethical implications of his partnerships underscores the delicate balance between personal interests and public perception in the tumultuous world of royalty and entertainment.
